“Fun, faster than walking, and more convenient than a bike”: Skateboarding in a college town

Vulnerable road users (those walking, or using bikes, scooters, or skateboards, for example) are common on college campuses and in college towns. As a mode of transportation, skateboards have not received much recognition, even as their popularity has increased. This study aimed to examine the perceptions and experiences of those who engage in skateboarding in and around a college town and its campus via qualitative interviews. An interview script was developed to investigate the experiences of those who used a skateboard for transportation. Queries included reasons for using a skateboard, local perceptions, existing barriers and enablers, and past experiences. Responses were gathered via both one-on-one interview and hardcopy interview and were transcribed and analyzed for common themes. Forty-two interviews were conducted an analyzed. Participants shed light on several themes included reasons for using a skateboard for transportation; physical health and emotional well-being; feelings of accomplishment; and community connectedness (or exclusivity). The results of this study offer a unique perspective, as those who used a skateboard exhibited a heightened sense of place, community connectiveness, and accessibility, coupled with physical activity and stress relief. However, they found the mixed messaging present in the transportation landscape to be alienating, effectively discouraging skateboarding as a transportation option by making those using skateboards feel unwelcome no matter where they ride. Skateboarding is not as visually or publicly supported by infrastructure and culture as are cycling and walking, unintentionally hindering the benefits of skateboard use. All vulnerable road users need to be considered in transportation planning. Where completely separated travel lanes are not feasible, shared travel spaces, or the redesignation of existing bike lanes and sidewalks for multiple use, might help overcome many issues that are rooted in exclusion. • Skateboarding offers benefits beyond sport and transportation. • Skateboarding provides an inclusive sense of place within a college town. • Restrictive policies and infrastructure present unique challenges for skateboarders. • Those who skateboard offer a distinctive viewpoint often absent in urban planning. • Further explanatory research is necessary to navigate these impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transport & Health
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2024.101888
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Fun, faster than walking, and more convenient than a bike”: Skateboarding in a college town

Aimee L. Ward, Seth Rainey, Logan Heffelman, Suraiya Parvin
2 citations
Journal of Transport & Health
Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking
1.29
article

“Fun, faster than walking, and more convenient than a bike”: Skateboarding in a college town

Aimee L. Ward, Seth Rainey, Logan Heffelman, Suraiya Parvin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Vulnerable road users (those walking, or using bikes, scooters, or skateboards, for example) are common on college campuses and in college towns. As a mode of transportation, skateboards have not received much recognition, even as their popularity has increased. This study aimed to examine the perceptions and experiences of those who engage in skateboarding in and around a college town and its campus via qualitative interviews. An interview script was developed to investigate the experiences of those who used a skateboard for transportation. Queries included reasons for using a skateboard, local perceptions, existing barriers and enablers, and past experiences. Responses were gathered via both one-on-one interview and hardcopy interview and were transcribed and analyzed for common themes. Forty-two interviews were conducted an analyzed. Participants shed light on several themes included reasons for using a skateboard for transportation; physical health and emotional well-being; feelings of accomplishment; and community connectedness (or exclusivity). The results of this study offer a unique perspective, as those who used a skateboard exhibited a heightened sense of place, community connectiveness, and accessibility, coupled with physical activity and stress relief. However, they found the mixed messaging present in the transportation landscape to be alienating, effectively discouraging skateboarding as a transportation option by making those using skateboards feel unwelcome no matter where they ride. Skateboarding is not as visually or publicly supported by infrastructure and culture as are cycling and walking, unintentionally hindering the benefits of skateboard use. All vulnerable road users need to be considered in transportation planning. Where completely separated travel lanes are not feasible, shared travel spaces, or the redesignation of existing bike lanes and sidewalks for multiple use, might help overcome many issues that are rooted in exclusion. • Skateboarding offers benefits beyond sport and transportation. • Skateboarding provides an inclusive sense of place within a college town. • Restrictive policies and infrastructure present unique challenges for skateboarders. • Those who skateboard offer a distinctive viewpoint often absent in urban planning. • Further explanatory research is necessary to navigate these impacts.

Journal of Transport & HealthVol. 38
Pennsylvania State University (US), Kent State University (US)
Kent State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.