Lower and slower: Quantifying phosphorus leaching from struvite relative to monoammonium phosphate by 33P radioisotopic labeling

• Struvite is hypothesized to lessen P leaching relative to soluble ammonium phosphate fertilizers. • 33 P labeling and synthesis of struvite and MAP was used to directly track P fertilizer leaching. • Struvite reduced P leached by 17.4–20.4 % compared to monoammonium phosphate. • Fertilizer P leaching was consistently overestimated by the omission or difference method. • Struvite reduces P but proportionally more so N losses relative to MAP. Struvite (NH 4 MgPO 4 ·6H 2 O) is a slow-release phosphorus (P) fertilizer hypothesized to reduce nutrient leaching losses relative to highly water-soluble counterparts such as monoammonium phosphate (MAP). We assessed the leaching fate of P from struvite relative to MAP using soil column experiments for two soils representative of the United States Maize Belt, an Arguidoll and a Fragiudalf. Inorganic P and N in leachate (49.8 pore volumes (v p )) were directly quantified for synthesized 33 P-labeled struvite and 33 P-labeled MAP directly and indirectly by omission method (i.e., by difference with a P-unfertilized treatment). By 8.3 v p , less than 0.02 % of struvite-P was leached in the Fragiudalf according to both methods of determination, compared to 11.1 % MAP-P determined directly by 33 P tracing and 14.1 % of MAP-P by the omission method. Fertilizer-P leached quantified directly by 33 P labeling was on average 1.2- to 3.7-fold lower than by indirectly by omission for both fertilizers at 2.8–13.9 v p across both soils, indicating consistent overestimation in P leaching by the commonly used omission method. Leaching of struvite-N was an order of magnitude lower than MAP-N in the Fragiudalf after 8.3 v p . Struvite entailed 17.4 %–20.4 % lower P leaching and 22.1–46 % lower N leaching compared to MAP across soils under simulated extreme precipitation events, supporting the hypothesized ability of struvite to reduce P as well as N leaching relative to more water-soluble ammonium phosphate fertilizers such as MAP. Additionally, our results point to a methodological need to validate fertilizer P leaching estimated by the commonly used omission method using direct quantification by radioisotopic labeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116990
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Phosphorus and nutrient management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lower and slower: Quantifying phosphorus leaching from struvite relative to monoammonium phosphate by 33P radioisotopic labeling

Neha Chatterjee, Andrew J. Margenot, Chongyang Li, Patricia Leon
3 citations
Geoderma
Phosphorus and nutrient management
0.88
article

Lower and slower: Quantifying phosphorus leaching from struvite relative to monoammonium phosphate by 33P radioisotopic labeling

Neha Chatterjee, Andrew J. Margenot, Chongyang Li, Patricia Leon
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Struvite is hypothesized to lessen P leaching relative to soluble ammonium phosphate fertilizers. • 33 P labeling and synthesis of struvite and MAP was used to directly track P fertilizer leaching. • Struvite reduced P leached by 17.4–20.4 % compared to monoammonium phosphate. • Fertilizer P leaching was consistently overestimated by the omission or difference method. • Struvite reduces P but proportionally more so N losses relative to MAP. Struvite (NH 4 MgPO 4 ·6H 2 O) is a slow-release phosphorus (P) fertilizer hypothesized to reduce nutrient leaching losses relative to highly water-soluble counterparts such as monoammonium phosphate (MAP). We assessed the leaching fate of P from struvite relative to MAP using soil column experiments for two soils representative of the United States Maize Belt, an Arguidoll and a Fragiudalf. Inorganic P and N in leachate (49.8 pore volumes (v p )) were directly quantified for synthesized 33 P-labeled struvite and 33 P-labeled MAP directly and indirectly by omission method (i.e., by difference with a P-unfertilized treatment). By 8.3 v p , less than 0.02 % of struvite-P was leached in the Fragiudalf according to both methods of determination, compared to 11.1 % MAP-P determined directly by 33 P tracing and 14.1 % of MAP-P by the omission method. Fertilizer-P leached quantified directly by 33 P labeling was on average 1.2- to 3.7-fold lower than by indirectly by omission for both fertilizers at 2.8–13.9 v p across both soils, indicating consistent overestimation in P leaching by the commonly used omission method. Leaching of struvite-N was an order of magnitude lower than MAP-N in the Fragiudalf after 8.3 v p . Struvite entailed 17.4 %–20.4 % lower P leaching and 22.1–46 % lower N leaching compared to MAP across soils under simulated extreme precipitation events, supporting the hypothesized ability of struvite to reduce P as well as N leaching relative to more water-soluble ammonium phosphate fertilizers such as MAP. Additionally, our results point to a methodological need to validate fertilizer P leaching estimated by the commonly used omission method using direct quantification by radioisotopic labeling.

GeodermaVol. 449
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Illinois Nutrient Research and Education Council
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Phosphorus and nutrient management
0.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.