Number- and size-controlled rainfall regimes in the Netherlands: physical reality or statistical mirage?

Abstract. An experimental study aimed at identifying special rainfall regimes with the help of co-located disdrometers is performed. Eight potentially special events (i.e., four number-controlled events and four size-controlled events) are identified and examined. However, a detailed cross-check with additional, independent radar measurements reveals no clear evidence of special rainfall dynamics. The research underscores the difficulty of experimentally confirming seemingly straightforward questions about rainfall patterns and dynamics that have been theorized in the literature for several decades but never formally validated experimentally. The study also questions the reliability of previous claims and serves as a reminder to approach such problems with more caution, emphasizing the need for rigorous uncertainty analysis and multiple cross-checks between sensors to avoid misinterpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-4789-2024
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Number- and size-controlled rainfall regimes in the Netherlands: physical reality or statistical mirage?

Marc Schleiss
1 citations
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
0.38
article

Number- and size-controlled rainfall regimes in the Netherlands: physical reality or statistical mirage?

Marc Schleiss
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. An experimental study aimed at identifying special rainfall regimes with the help of co-located disdrometers is performed. Eight potentially special events (i.e., four number-controlled events and four size-controlled events) are identified and examined. However, a detailed cross-check with additional, independent radar measurements reveals no clear evidence of special rainfall dynamics. The research underscores the difficulty of experimentally confirming seemingly straightforward questions about rainfall patterns and dynamics that have been theorized in the literature for several decades but never formally validated experimentally. The study also questions the reliability of previous claims and serves as a reminder to approach such problems with more caution, emphasizing the need for rigorous uncertainty analysis and multiple cross-checks between sensors to avoid misinterpretation.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 17(16)
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
0.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.