AWeCita: Generating Answer with Appropriate and Well-grained Citations Using LLMs

Large language models (LLMs) excel in various Natural Language Processing tasks but struggle with hallucinations, leading to potentially misleading responses. Researchers have extensively explored LLMs’ citation practices. However, existing efforts often overlook the crucial aspects of the appropriateness and granularity of citation, which are vital for mitigating hallucination and enhancing interpretability. To bridge this gap and improve the quality of citations, we propose the Generating Answers with Appropriate and Well-grained Citations using LLMs task (AWeCita), with a focus on citing appropriately with a well granularity. Based on the traditional evaluation metrics of answer accuracy and citation correctness, we introduce two new evaluation metrics, citation appropriateness and citation granularity, to assess LLMs’ performance on this task more comprehensively and accurately. We conduct a series of exploratory experiments on ASQA and ELI5 datasets. The experimental results show that, AWeCita outperforms traditional tasks in the metric of citation granularity, most of our methods show a certain advantage incitation appropriateness, however, the improvement towards well-grained citation affects the quote-level citation correctness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Data Intelligence
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3724/2096-7004.di.2024.0035
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AWeCita: Generating Answer with Appropriate and Well-grained Citations Using LLMs

Suifeng Zhao, Zhuoran Jin, Hongbang Yuan, Yubo Chen et al.
1 citations
Data Intelligence
Topic Modeling
0.35
article

AWeCita: Generating Answer with Appropriate and Well-grained Citations Using LLMs

Suifeng Zhao, Zhuoran Jin, Hongbang Yuan, Yubo Chen, Kang Liu, Sujian Li, Tong Zhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) excel in various Natural Language Processing tasks but struggle with hallucinations, leading to potentially misleading responses. Researchers have extensively explored LLMs’ citation practices. However, existing efforts often overlook the crucial aspects of the appropriateness and granularity of citation, which are vital for mitigating hallucination and enhancing interpretability. To bridge this gap and improve the quality of citations, we propose the Generating Answers with Appropriate and Well-grained Citations using LLMs task (AWeCita), with a focus on citing appropriately with a well granularity. Based on the traditional evaluation metrics of answer accuracy and citation correctness, we introduce two new evaluation metrics, citation appropriateness and citation granularity, to assess LLMs’ performance on this task more comprehensively and accurately. We conduct a series of exploratory experiments on ASQA and ELI5 datasets. The experimental results show that, AWeCita outperforms traditional tasks in the metric of citation granularity, most of our methods show a certain advantage incitation appropriateness, however, the improvement towards well-grained citation affects the quote-level citation correctness.

Data IntelligenceVol. 6(4)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Youth Innovation Promotion Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Topic Modeling
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.