763. TEXTBOOK ONCOLOGIC OUTCOME FOLLOWING TRIMODALITY THERAPY FOR ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA

Abstract Background Although the concept of textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) as an emerging quality benchmark has been validated in the general surgical oncology literature, data regarding the frequency of achieving TOO and its impact on subsequent survival outcomes in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) who undergo trimodality therapy remain undefined. Methods Patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ, Siewert I/II) who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy at a single institution (2000-2022) were retrospectively identified. Patients undergoing salvage resection were excluded. TOO was defined according to a published consensus definition: length of stay (LOS) ≤14 days, R0, ≥20 resected lymph nodes, no anastomotic leak (any grade), no Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥3 complications, no hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) readmission, and no reoperation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify clinicopathologic features associated with TOO. Multivariable Cox regression and landmark analyses were used to quantify the association between TOO and OS. Results Of 1138 patients, TOO was observed in 38.2% (435): 90.9% (1034) R0, 60.9% (693) ≥20 lymph nodes, 89.9% (1023) no anastomotic leak, and 98.4% (1120) no in-hospital mortality. Features independently associated with reduced odds of TOO included: cervical anastomosis (OR 0.50, P=0.001), preoperative delay ≥90 days after neoadjuvant therapy (OR 0.62, P=0.004), induction chemotherapy (OR 0.74, P=0.039), coronary artery disease (OR 0.67, P=0.043). Among patients who underwent esophagectomy <90 days after neoadjuvant therapy and survived ≥30 days, TOO was independently associated with improved OS (HR 0.80, P=0.018). TOO remained associated with improved OS using 90-day (P=0.014) and 120-day (P=0.037) landmarks. Conclusions Although TOO is difficult to achieve following trimodality therapy for EAC, it is strongly associated with improved long-term overall survival. As such, further efforts are warranted to explore the utility of TOO as a quality benchmark in EAC patients and to validate its impact across varying practice settings.