Sensitivity Analyses for Means or Proportions with Missing Outcome Data

We describe an approach to sensitivity analysis introduced by Robins et al (1999), for the setting where the outcome is missing for some observations. This flexible approach focuses on the relationship between the outcomes and missingness, where data can be missing completely at random, missing at random given observed data, or missing not at random. We provide examples from HIV that include the sensitivity of the estimation of a mean and proportion under different missingness mechanisms. The approach illustrated provides a method for examining how the results of epidemiologic studies might shift as a function of bias due to missing data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/5zyg-5q86
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity Analyses for Means or Proportions with Missing Outcome Data

Cole S.R, Edwards J.K, Zivich P.N, Hudgens M.G et al.
UNC Libraries
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Sensitivity Analyses for Means or Proportions with Missing Outcome Data

Cole S.R, Edwards J.K, Zivich P.N, Hudgens M.G, Shook-Sa B.E
article en

Abstract

We describe an approach to sensitivity analysis introduced by Robins et al (1999), for the setting where the outcome is missing for some observations. This flexible approach focuses on the relationship between the outcomes and missingness, where data can be missing completely at random, missing at random given observed data, or missing not at random. We provide examples from HIV that include the sensitivity of the estimation of a mean and proportion under different missingness mechanisms. The approach illustrated provides a method for examining how the results of epidemiologic studies might shift as a function of bias due to missing data.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sensitivity Analyses for Means or Proportions with Missing Outcome Data — Cole S.R, Edwards J.K, et al. · UNC Libraries (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS