The progenitor star of SN 2023ixf: a massive red supergiant with enhanced, episodic pre-supernova mass loss
ABSTRACT We identify the progenitor star of SN 2023ixf in Messier 101 using Keck/NIRC2 adaptive optics imaging and pre-explosion Hubble Space Telescope (HST)/Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) images. The supernova, localized with diffraction spikes and high-precision astrometry, unambiguously coincides with a progenitor candidate of $m_\text{F814W}=24.87\pm 0.05$ (AB). Given its reported infrared excess and semiregular variability, we fit a time-dependent spectral energy distribution (SED) model of a dusty red supergiant (RSG) to a combined data set of HST optical, ground-based near-infrared, and Spitzer Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) [3.6], [4.5] photometry. The progenitor resembles an RSG of $T_\text{eff}=3488\pm 39$ K and $\log (L/\mathrm{L}_\odot)=5.15\pm 0.02$, with a $0.13\pm 0.01$ dex ($31.1\pm 1.7$ per cent) luminosity variation at a period of $P=1144.7\pm 4.8$ d, obscured by a dusty envelope of $\tau =2.92\pm 0.02$ at $1\, \mu \text{m}$ in optical depth (or $A_\text{V}=8.43\pm 0.11$ mag). The signatures match a post-main-sequence star of $18.2_{-0.6}^{+1.3}\, \mathrm{M}_\odot$ in zero-age main-sequence mass, among the most massive SN II progenitor, with a pulsation-enhanced mass-loss rate of $\dot{M}=(4.32\pm 0.26)\times 10^{-4} \, \mathrm{M}_\odot \, \text{yr}^{-1}$. The dense and confined circumstellar material is ejected during the last episode of radial pulsation before the explosion. Notably, we find strong evidence for variations of $\tau$ or $T_\text{eff}$ along with luminosity, a necessary assumption to reproduce the wavelength-dependent variability, which implies periodic dust sublimation and condensation. Given the observed SED, partial dust obscuration remains possible, but any unobstructed binary companion over $5.6\, \mathrm{ M}_\odot$ can be ruled out.
Authors
- Yu-Jing Qin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3658-6026)
- I. Irani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7996-8780)
- J. Sollerman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1546-6615)
- E. Zimmerman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8985-2493)
- C. Fremling (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4223-103X)
- A. Gal‐Yam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3653-5598)
- S. R. Kulkarni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-8563)
- D. A. Perley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8472-1996)
- J. S. Bloom (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7777-216X)
- M. W. Coughlin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8262-2924)
- Steve Schulze (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6797-1889)
- Keming Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9870-5695)
- M. M. Kasliwal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5619-4938)
Institutions
- Northwestern University (US)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- AlbaNova (SE)
- Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
- Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2024-08-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2012
- Citations
- 34
- Primary Topic
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 11.27
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Israel Science Foundation
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Science and Technology Facilities Council
- Helen Kimmel Center for Planetary Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science