Root cause analysis of cases involving diagnosis

Diagnostic errors comprise the leading threat to patient safety in healthcare today. Learning how to extract the lessons from cases where diagnosis succeeds or fails is a promising approach to improve diagnostic safety going forward. We present up-to-date and authoritative guidance on how the existing approaches to conducting root cause analyses (RCA's) can be modified to study cases involving diagnosis. There are several diffierences: In cases involving diagnosis, the investigation should begin immediately after the incident, and clinicians involved in the case should be members of the RCA team. The review must include consideration of how the clinical reasoning process went astray (or succeeded), and use a human-factors perspective to consider the system-related contextual factors in the diagnostic process. We present detailed instructions for conducting RCA's of cases involving diagnosis, with advice on how to identify root causes and contributing factors and select appropriate interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnosis
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0102
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Root cause analysis of cases involving diagnosis

Gerard M. Castro, Mark L. Graber, Laura Zwaan, Ruth Ryan et al.
11 citations
Diagnosis
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
5.53
article

Root cause analysis of cases involving diagnosis

Gerard M. Castro, Mark L. Graber, Laura Zwaan, Ruth Ryan, Pat Croskerry, Bob Trowbridge, Carole Hemmalgarn, Michael P. Tozier, J. O. Wright, Jean‐Luc Tilly, Rob El-Kareh, Missy Danforth
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Diagnostic errors comprise the leading threat to patient safety in healthcare today. Learning how to extract the lessons from cases where diagnosis succeeds or fails is a promising approach to improve diagnostic safety going forward. We present up-to-date and authoritative guidance on how the existing approaches to conducting root cause analyses (RCA's) can be modified to study cases involving diagnosis. There are several diffierences: In cases involving diagnosis, the investigation should begin immediately after the incident, and clinicians involved in the case should be members of the RCA team. The review must include consideration of how the clinical reasoning process went astray (or succeeded), and use a human-factors perspective to consider the system-related contextual factors in the diagnostic process. We present detailed instructions for conducting RCA's of cases involving diagnosis, with advice on how to identify root causes and contributing factors and select appropriate interventions.

DiagnosisVol. 11(4)
Intermountain Healthcare (US), Dalhousie University (CA), Maine Medical Center (US), Georgetown University (US), University of California San Diego (US), Leapfrog Group (US), Plymouth State University (US)
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
5.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.