766. LASTING SYMPTOMS AFTER OESOPHAGEAL RESECTIONAL SURGERY (LASORS): MULTICENTRE VALIDATION COHORT STUDY

Abstract Background As outcomes following curative-intent oesophageal cancer treatment improve, more patients are living with the long-term morbidity of cancer therapies, the symptoms of which are poorly recognised and understood. Existing symptomatology and quality-of-life tools are cumbersome and moreover are not designed specifically for evaluation of post-treatment survivorship. The LASER study and subsequent consultation process identified six key symptoms thought to predict poor health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) as measured by validated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) tools. The current study aimed to validate this six-symptom LAsting Symptoms after Oesophageal Resection (LASOR) clinical tool, and assess its clinical utility. Methods In this multi-centre cohort study, patients who underwent oesophagectomy between January 2015 and June 2019 across the United Kingdom, and were disease-free at least one-year post-treatment, were asked to complete LASOR, EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25 questionnaires. LASOR symptoms (low mood, reduced energy, thoracotomy pain, heartburn, diarrhoea, and bloating after eating) were evaluated using composite scores based on frequency and quality of life impact, and correlated with EORTC HRQoL scores. The ability of the LASOR tool to predict patients with poor HRQoL was validated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Patient acceptability of the tool was assessed using a separate questionnaire. Results 263 participants were included. 192 (73%) were males. Surgical technique included open (61%), hybrid (18%), and minimally-invasive (21%). 203 patients (77%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. 148 patients (56%) experienced a post-operative complication. Four LASOR symptoms were associated with significantly lower HRQoL: reduced energy (OR=2.13; 95% CI 1.20-2.87), low mood (OR=1.86; 95% CI 1.45–3.12), diarrhoea (OR=1.48; 95% CI 1.06–2.06), and bloating (OR=1.35; 95%CI 1.03-1.77). In combination, the LASOR symptoms produced an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 (sensitivity = 0.82, specificity = 0.73). Conclusion The six-symptom LASOR tool generated a reliable model for identification of patients with a poor HRQoL, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of over 80%. This is the first clinical symptom tool to be validated in the post-curative-treatment setting for patients with oesophageal cancer. The LASOR tool is straightforward to administer and highly acceptable to patients, and can be used to identify those at risk of high morbidity and poor quality of life in surveillance programmes. In turn, evidence-based survivorship services can be integrated into patient follow-up to alleviate the burden of cancer treatment on oesophagectomy patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Esophagus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.367
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

766. LASTING SYMPTOMS AFTER OESOPHAGEAL RESECTIONAL SURGERY (LASORS): MULTICENTRE VALIDATION COHORT STUDY

Khaled Dawas, J. Robert O’Neill, Borzoueh Mohammadi, Sheraz R. Markar et al.
Diseases of the Esophagus
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

766. LASTING SYMPTOMS AFTER OESOPHAGEAL RESECTIONAL SURGERY (LASORS): MULTICENTRE VALIDATION COHORT STUDY

Khaled Dawas, J. Robert O’Neill, Borzoueh Mohammadi, Sheraz R. Markar, Swathikan Chidambaram, Yassar Qureshi, Bilal Alkhaffaf, Nick Dai, Ravinder Vohra, Heidi Paine
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background As outcomes following curative-intent oesophageal cancer treatment improve, more patients are living with the long-term morbidity of cancer therapies, the symptoms of which are poorly recognised and understood. Existing symptomatology and quality-of-life tools are cumbersome and moreover are not designed specifically for evaluation of post-treatment survivorship. The LASER study and subsequent consultation process identified six key symptoms thought to predict poor health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) as measured by validated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) tools. The current study aimed to validate this six-symptom LAsting Symptoms after Oesophageal Resection (LASOR) clinical tool, and assess its clinical utility. Methods In this multi-centre cohort study, patients who underwent oesophagectomy between January 2015 and June 2019 across the United Kingdom, and were disease-free at least one-year post-treatment, were asked to complete LASOR, EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25 questionnaires. LASOR symptoms (low mood, reduced energy, thoracotomy pain, heartburn, diarrhoea, and bloating after eating) were evaluated using composite scores based on frequency and quality of life impact, and correlated with EORTC HRQoL scores. The ability of the LASOR tool to predict patients with poor HRQoL was validated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Patient acceptability of the tool was assessed using a separate questionnaire. Results 263 participants were included. 192 (73%) were males. Surgical technique included open (61%), hybrid (18%), and minimally-invasive (21%). 203 patients (77%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. 148 patients (56%) experienced a post-operative complication. Four LASOR symptoms were associated with significantly lower HRQoL: reduced energy (OR=2.13; 95% CI 1.20-2.87), low mood (OR=1.86; 95% CI 1.45–3.12), diarrhoea (OR=1.48; 95% CI 1.06–2.06), and bloating (OR=1.35; 95%CI 1.03-1.77). In combination, the LASOR symptoms produced an area under the ROC curve of 0.85 (sensitivity = 0.82, specificity = 0.73). Conclusion The six-symptom LASOR tool generated a reliable model for identification of patients with a poor HRQoL, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of over 80%. This is the first clinical symptom tool to be validated in the post-curative-treatment setting for patients with oesophageal cancer. The LASOR tool is straightforward to administer and highly acceptable to patients, and can be used to identify those at risk of high morbidity and poor quality of life in surveillance programmes. In turn, evidence-based survivorship services can be integrated into patient follow-up to alleviate the burden of cancer treatment on oesophagectomy patients.

Diseases of the EsophagusVol. 37(Supplement_1)
University College Hospital (GB), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Churchill Hospital (GB), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Salford Royal Hospital (GB), Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.