484. DELTA-IRP AS A NEW HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY METRIC TO PREDICT THE POSITIVE OUTCOME OF LAPAROSCOPIC HELLER-DOR IN PATIENTS WITH ACHALASIA

Abstract Background There is no consensus on the definition of failure after treatment in patients with esophageal achalasia. The Eckardt score (ES) is commonly used to define clinical outcome, but objective metrics based on high-resolution manometry (HRM) or other tools are lacking. Aim of this study was to identify any HRM objective parameters useful to predict a positive outcome after surgical treatment with laparoscopic Heller-Dor (LHD). Methods Patients who had undergone LHD between 2012 and 2022, with pre- and postoperative HRM at our Center, were enrolled. Patients were divided according to the outcome of treatment between success group (SG, symptom relief or resolution) and failure group (FG, ES>3 or the need for additional treatment). Further to the traditional HRM metrics commonly evaluated, we also measured the difference between median values of pre- and postoperative Integrated Relaxation Pressure (∆-IRP). A ROC curve analysis was applied to assess the accuracy of each HRM parameter identified. Data are reported in Table 1. Results We enrolled 358 patients (F:M=177:187): 331 in the SG and 27 in the FG. The ∆-IRP was higher in SG [22mmHg (IQR:15-31)] than in FG [14.3mmHg (IQR:9.9-18.3), p=0.04]. The univariate analysis is showed in Table 1. At multivariate analysis, the ∆-IRP was the only parameter independently related to clinical success (p<0.01). The ROC curve for the ∆-IRP showed an area under the curve of 0.71, with a threshold value set at 16.55 mmHg (sensibility 71%, specificity 70%). Conclusions Our data showed that the ∆-IRP with a threshold of 16.5 mmHg could represent a new objective tool to predict the positive outcome of LHD in patients with esophageal achalasia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Esophagus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.223
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

484. DELTA-IRP AS A NEW HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY METRIC TO PREDICT THE POSITIVE OUTCOME OF LAPAROSCOPIC HELLER-DOR IN PATIENTS WITH ACHALASIA

Matteo Pittacolo, Renato Salvador, Loredana Nicoletti, Lucia Moletta et al.
Diseases of the Esophagus
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

484. DELTA-IRP AS A NEW HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY METRIC TO PREDICT THE POSITIVE OUTCOME OF LAPAROSCOPIC HELLER-DOR IN PATIENTS WITH ACHALASIA

Matteo Pittacolo, Renato Salvador, Loredana Nicoletti, Lucia Moletta, Giovanni Capovilla, Matteo Santangelo, Arianna Vittori, Michele Valmasoni, Giulia Nezi, Francesca Forattini, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino, Mario Costantini, Andrea Costantini, Luca Provenzano
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background There is no consensus on the definition of failure after treatment in patients with esophageal achalasia. The Eckardt score (ES) is commonly used to define clinical outcome, but objective metrics based on high-resolution manometry (HRM) or other tools are lacking. Aim of this study was to identify any HRM objective parameters useful to predict a positive outcome after surgical treatment with laparoscopic Heller-Dor (LHD). Methods Patients who had undergone LHD between 2012 and 2022, with pre- and postoperative HRM at our Center, were enrolled. Patients were divided according to the outcome of treatment between success group (SG, symptom relief or resolution) and failure group (FG, ES>3 or the need for additional treatment). Further to the traditional HRM metrics commonly evaluated, we also measured the difference between median values of pre- and postoperative Integrated Relaxation Pressure (∆-IRP). A ROC curve analysis was applied to assess the accuracy of each HRM parameter identified. Data are reported in Table 1. Results We enrolled 358 patients (F:M=177:187): 331 in the SG and 27 in the FG. The ∆-IRP was higher in SG [22mmHg (IQR:15-31)] than in FG [14.3mmHg (IQR:9.9-18.3), p=0.04]. The univariate analysis is showed in Table 1. At multivariate analysis, the ∆-IRP was the only parameter independently related to clinical success (p<0.01). The ROC curve for the ∆-IRP showed an area under the curve of 0.71, with a threshold value set at 16.55 mmHg (sensibility 71%, specificity 70%). Conclusions Our data showed that the ∆-IRP with a threshold of 16.5 mmHg could represent a new objective tool to predict the positive outcome of LHD in patients with esophageal achalasia.

Diseases of the EsophagusVol. 37(Supplement_1)
University of Padua (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.