Handheld Ultrasound Devices Used by Newly Certified Operators for Pneumonia in the Emergency Department—A Diagnostic Accuracy Study

The diagnostic accuracy of handheld ultrasound (HHUS) devices operated by newly certified operators for pneumonia is unknown. This multicenter diagnostic accuracy study included patients prospectively suspected of pneumonia from February 2021 to February 2022 in four emergency departments. The index test was a 14-zone focused lung ultrasound (FLUS) examination, with consolidation with air bronchograms as diagnostic criteria for pneumonia. FLUS examinations were performed by newly certified operators using HHUS. The reference standard was computed tomography (CT) and expert diagnosis using all medical records. The sensitivity and specificity of FLUS and chest X-ray (CXR) were compared using McNemar's test. Of the 324 scanned patients, 212 (65%) had pneumonia, according to the expert diagnosis. FLUS had a sensitivity of 31% (95% CI 26-36) and a specificity of 82% (95% CI 78-86) compared with the experts' diagnosis. Compared with CT, FLUS had a sensitivity of 32% (95% CI 27-37) and specificity of 81% (95% CI 77-85). CXR had a sensitivity of 66% (95% CI 61-72) and a specificity of 76% (95% CI 71-81) compared with the experts' diagnosis. Compared with CT, CXR had a sensitivity of 69% (95% CI 63-74) and a specificity of 68% (95% CI 62-72). Compared with the experts' diagnosis and CT diagnosis, FLUS performed by newly certified operators using HHUS devices had a significantly lower sensitivity for pneumonia when compared to CXR (<i>p</i> < 0.001). FLUS had a significantly higher specificity than CXR using CT diagnosis as a reference standard (<i>p</i> = 0.02). HHUS exhibited low sensitivity for pneumonia when used by newly certified operators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171921
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Handheld Ultrasound Devices Used by Newly Certified Operators for Pneumonia in the Emergency Department—A Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Michael Brun Andersen, Morten Hjarnø Lorentzen, Anne Heltborg, Christian Backer Mogensen et al.
3 citations
Diagnostics
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
1.27
article

Handheld Ultrasound Devices Used by Newly Certified Operators for Pneumonia in the Emergency Department—A Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Michael Brun Andersen, Morten Hjarnø Lorentzen, Anne Heltborg, Christian Backer Mogensen, Helene Skjøt‐Arkil, Mariana Bichuette Cartuliares, Christian Borbjerg Laursen, Stefan Posth, Søren Helbo Skaarup, Ole Graumann, Frida Kaldan, Mats Lindberg, Jens Juel Specht, Camilla Stræde Spile, Marshall I. Hertz, Meinhard Reinert Hansen
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of handheld ultrasound (HHUS) devices operated by newly certified operators for pneumonia is unknown. This multicenter diagnostic accuracy study included patients prospectively suspected of pneumonia from February 2021 to February 2022 in four emergency departments. The index test was a 14-zone focused lung ultrasound (FLUS) examination, with consolidation with air bronchograms as diagnostic criteria for pneumonia. FLUS examinations were performed by newly certified operators using HHUS. The reference standard was computed tomography (CT) and expert diagnosis using all medical records. The sensitivity and specificity of FLUS and chest X-ray (CXR) were compared using McNemar's test. Of the 324 scanned patients, 212 (65%) had pneumonia, according to the expert diagnosis. FLUS had a sensitivity of 31% (95% CI 26-36) and a specificity of 82% (95% CI 78-86) compared with the experts' diagnosis. Compared with CT, FLUS had a sensitivity of 32% (95% CI 27-37) and specificity of 81% (95% CI 77-85). CXR had a sensitivity of 66% (95% CI 61-72) and a specificity of 76% (95% CI 71-81) compared with the experts' diagnosis. Compared with CT, CXR had a sensitivity of 69% (95% CI 63-74) and a specificity of 68% (95% CI 62-72). Compared with the experts' diagnosis and CT diagnosis, FLUS performed by newly certified operators using HHUS devices had a significantly lower sensitivity for pneumonia when compared to CXR (<i>p</i> < 0.001). FLUS had a significantly higher specificity than CXR using CT diagnosis as a reference standard (<i>p</i> = 0.02). HHUS exhibited low sensitivity for pneumonia when used by newly certified operators.

DiagnosticsVol. 14(17)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Gentofte Hospital (DK), Region of Southern Denmark (DK)
Syddansk Universitet, Klinisk Institut, Syddansk Universitet
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
1.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.