Estimating additive interaction in 2-stage individual participant data meta-analysis

Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis provides important opportunities to study interaction and effect modification for which individual studies often lack power. While previous meta-analyses have commonly focused on multiplicative interaction, additive interaction holds greater relevance for public health and may in certain contexts better reflect biological interaction. Methodological literature on interaction in IPD meta-analysis does not cover additive interaction for models including binary or time-to-event outcomes. We aimed to describe how the Relative Excess Risk due to Interaction (RERI) and other measures of additive interaction or effect modification can be validly estimated within 2-stage IPD meta-analysis. First, we explain why direct pooling of study-level RERI estimates may lead to invalid results. Next, we propose a 3-step procedure to estimate additive interaction: (1) estimate effects of both exposures and their product term on the outcome within each individual study; (2) pool study-specific estimates using multivariate meta-analysis; (3) estimate an overall RERI and 95% confidence interval based on the pooled effect estimates. We illustrate this procedure by investigating interaction between depression and smoking and risk of smoking-related cancers using data from the PSYchosocial factors and Cancer (PSY-CA) consortium. We discuss implications of this procedure, including the application in meta-analysis based on published data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwae325
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating additive interaction in 2-stage individual participant data meta-analysis

Philipp Frank, Maartje Basten, Erik R. Sund, Lonneke A. van Tuijl et al.
4 citations
American Journal of Epidemiology
Mental Health Research Topics
2.03
article

Estimating additive interaction in 2-stage individual participant data meta-analysis

Philipp Frank, Maartje Basten, Erik R. Sund, Lonneke A. van Tuijl, Mirjam I. Geerlings, Lützen Portengen, Yves Payette, Nolwenn Noisel, Adriaan W. Hoogendoorn, Joost Dekker, Aeilko H. Zwinderman, Henrike Galenkamp, Adelita V. Ranchor, Femke Lamers, Kuan‐Yu Pan, Mirjam J. Knol
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis provides important opportunities to study interaction and effect modification for which individual studies often lack power. While previous meta-analyses have commonly focused on multiplicative interaction, additive interaction holds greater relevance for public health and may in certain contexts better reflect biological interaction. Methodological literature on interaction in IPD meta-analysis does not cover additive interaction for models including binary or time-to-event outcomes. We aimed to describe how the Relative Excess Risk due to Interaction (RERI) and other measures of additive interaction or effect modification can be validly estimated within 2-stage IPD meta-analysis. First, we explain why direct pooling of study-level RERI estimates may lead to invalid results. Next, we propose a 3-step procedure to estimate additive interaction: (1) estimate effects of both exposures and their product term on the outcome within each individual study; (2) pool study-specific estimates using multivariate meta-analysis; (3) estimate an overall RERI and 95% confidence interval based on the pooled effect estimates. We illustrate this procedure by investigating interaction between depression and smoking and risk of smoking-related cancers using data from the PSYchosocial factors and Cancer (PSY-CA) consortium. We discuss implications of this procedure, including the application in meta-analysis based on published data.

American Journal of EpidemiologyVol. 194(6)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Levanger Hospital (NO), Nord University (NO), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CA), Karolinska Institutet (SE), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), The London College (GB), GGD Amsterdam (NL), Public Health Service of Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University College London (GB), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, National Institute for Health and Care Research, European Commission, ZonMw, Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport, Helse Midt-Norge, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Mental Health Research Topics
2.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.