340. THE IMPACT OF OBESITY ON SURGICAL OUTCOMES AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER IN SWEDEN

Abstract Background Global obesity rates continue to rise and are closely linked to an increase in esophageal adenocarcinoma. While obesity is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, its influence on long-term survival is less clear. Some studies suggest that obese patients have poorer outcomes due to higher comorbidity rates, while others indicate comparable or even better survival, possibly due to better nutritional reserves. This study aims to investigate whether obesity affects the survival and risk of postoperative complications in a national cohort of esophageal cancer patients. Methods This retrospective population-based register study included all individuals who underwent esophageal resection between 2006 and 2018 in Sweden. Data were extracted from the national quality registry for esophageal and gastric cancer (NREV). The cohort was grouped based on body mass index (BMI) into underweight (BMI < 20), normal (BMI 20-25), overweight (BMI 25-30), and obese (BMI > 30). Kaplan-Meier was used for survival analysis, and logistic regression and Cox regression were used for adjusted analyses (adjusting for sex, age, marital status, education level, Charlson comorbidity index score, histopathology, disease stage, and year of diagnosis). Results In total, 1742 individuals (79.9% males, mean age 66) were included, of whom 242 (13.9%) were obese. Obese individuals had more comorbidities at surgery, more commonly had adenocarcinoma, and underwent surgery more frequently in the later time period. The risk of surgical complications (e.g., anastomotic leak, bleeding) for obese individuals was not increased compared to those with normal weight (OR: 0.83 [0.56-1.21]), but an increased risk of non-surgical complications (e.g., pneumonia, cardiopulmonary events) was observed (OR: 1.78 [1.22-2.60]). The risk of death of any cause was decreased in obese individuals compared to those with normal weight (HR: 0.74 [0.58-0.95]), resulting in superior overall survival. Conclusion Despite the presence of more comorbidities among obese individuals undergoing esophagectomy, their risk of surgical complications remained comparable to those with normal weight. However, obese individuals exhibited a heightened susceptibility to other postoperative complications. Surprisingly, obese individuals demonstrated an improved overall survival at 5 years compared to those with normal weight.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Esophagus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.099
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

340. THE IMPACT OF OBESITY ON SURGICAL OUTCOMES AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER IN SWEDEN

Martin Skogar, Gustav Linder, Malin Enblad, Mats Lindblad
Diseases of the Esophagus
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

340. THE IMPACT OF OBESITY ON SURGICAL OUTCOMES AFTER ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER IN SWEDEN

Martin Skogar, Gustav Linder, Malin Enblad, Mats Lindblad
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Global obesity rates continue to rise and are closely linked to an increase in esophageal adenocarcinoma. While obesity is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, its influence on long-term survival is less clear. Some studies suggest that obese patients have poorer outcomes due to higher comorbidity rates, while others indicate comparable or even better survival, possibly due to better nutritional reserves. This study aims to investigate whether obesity affects the survival and risk of postoperative complications in a national cohort of esophageal cancer patients. Methods This retrospective population-based register study included all individuals who underwent esophageal resection between 2006 and 2018 in Sweden. Data were extracted from the national quality registry for esophageal and gastric cancer (NREV). The cohort was grouped based on body mass index (BMI) into underweight (BMI < 20), normal (BMI 20-25), overweight (BMI 25-30), and obese (BMI > 30). Kaplan-Meier was used for survival analysis, and logistic regression and Cox regression were used for adjusted analyses (adjusting for sex, age, marital status, education level, Charlson comorbidity index score, histopathology, disease stage, and year of diagnosis). Results In total, 1742 individuals (79.9% males, mean age 66) were included, of whom 242 (13.9%) were obese. Obese individuals had more comorbidities at surgery, more commonly had adenocarcinoma, and underwent surgery more frequently in the later time period. The risk of surgical complications (e.g., anastomotic leak, bleeding) for obese individuals was not increased compared to those with normal weight (OR: 0.83 [0.56-1.21]), but an increased risk of non-surgical complications (e.g., pneumonia, cardiopulmonary events) was observed (OR: 1.78 [1.22-2.60]). The risk of death of any cause was decreased in obese individuals compared to those with normal weight (HR: 0.74 [0.58-0.95]), resulting in superior overall survival. Conclusion Despite the presence of more comorbidities among obese individuals undergoing esophagectomy, their risk of surgical complications remained comparable to those with normal weight. However, obese individuals exhibited a heightened susceptibility to other postoperative complications. Surprisingly, obese individuals demonstrated an improved overall survival at 5 years compared to those with normal weight.

Diseases of the EsophagusVol. 37(Supplement_1)
Uppsala University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.