Validation and cut score’s estimation for the online learning scale using Item Response Theory

This study aims to validate the Online Learning Scale (OLS) and estimate the OLS’s cut score. The sample was 1,459 undergraduate students across different universities and field studies in Thailand. The OLS was newly developed by synthesizing related literature, focus groups, and observations and was designed to measure online learning quality from student-centered perspectives. The 24 OLS items were validated using Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT). The OLS’ cut score was estimated by analyzing the scale’s lowest points of the test information function. The effectiveness of OLS’ cut score was investigated by dividing groups of samples by cut score and analyzing their difference using Chi-square test and ANOVA with other variables. The results indicated that the OLS showed appropriate psychometric properties: 1) The Cronbach’s alpha reliability was .94 and discrimination indices were .62 to .79, 2) CFA fit indices indicated good fit (CFI = .953, RMSEA = .053), and 3) The IRT difficulty parameters were arranged in order and in the range of -3.0 to 3.0, while the discrimination parameters exceeded 0.65 in all items. The estimated two cut scores (29 and 48 points) effectively distinguished the online learning quality delivered to the students.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.2.28
Primary Topic
Education and Learning Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation and cut score’s estimation for the online learning scale using Item Response Theory

Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching
Education and Learning Interventions
article

Validation and cut score’s estimation for the online learning scale using Item Response Theory

article en

Abstract

This study aims to validate the Online Learning Scale (OLS) and estimate the OLS’s cut score. The sample was 1,459 undergraduate students across different universities and field studies in Thailand. The OLS was newly developed by synthesizing related literature, focus groups, and observations and was designed to measure online learning quality from student-centered perspectives. The 24 OLS items were validated using Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT). The OLS’ cut score was estimated by analyzing the scale’s lowest points of the test information function. The effectiveness of OLS’ cut score was investigated by dividing groups of samples by cut score and analyzing their difference using Chi-square test and ANOVA with other variables. The results indicated that the OLS showed appropriate psychometric properties: 1) The Cronbach’s alpha reliability was .94 and discrimination indices were .62 to .79, 2) CFA fit indices indicated good fit (CFI = .953, RMSEA = .053), and 3) The IRT difficulty parameters were arranged in order and in the range of -3.0 to 3.0, while the discrimination parameters exceeded 0.65 in all items. The estimated two cut scores (29 and 48 points) effectively distinguished the online learning quality delivered to the students.

Journal of Applied Learning & TeachingVol. 7(2)
Chulalongkorn University (TH)
National Research Council of Thailand
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Education and Learning Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.