Evaluating the efficiency of mandibular molar protraction using Herbst appliances versus temporary anchorage devices: a retrospective case-controlled study
The Herbst device could be a viable modality in cases with missing mandibular premolars where maximum anterior anchorage is desired, or if patients/parents are resistant to TADs. Furthermore, they could be beneficial in skeletal class II patients with mandibular deficiency who also need molar protraction. However, the increased incidence of emergency visits must be considered when treatment is planned.
Authors
- Neal D Kravitz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2521-3614)
- Chung How Kau (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4606-9551)
- Bill M. Dischinger
- Ejvis Lamani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6341-3134)
- Ishita Z. Taneja
- Guihua Zhai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1023-0824)
- Mark W. Johnston
Institutions
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Marietta College (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Progress in Orthodontics
- Published
- 2024-09-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-024-00533-3
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- dental development and anomalies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.47