Argumentasi Rasional Eksistensi Tuhan

This research aims to examine and reiterate the arguments used by Islamic scholars regarding the existence of God, by incorporating contemporary evidence supporting the validity of these arguments. Simultaneously, it aims to refute the atheist's assumption that the existence of God is impossible to scientifically prove. This study employs qualitative, descriptive, and analytical methods, along with a philosophical approach to the arguments presented in revelation and those used by Islamic scholars regarding the existence of God. The research is categorized as library research, drawing from classical and contemporary books, relevant scientific journals, or articles related to the study. Islamic scholars, based on the Quran and Sunnah, have put forth various rational arguments for the existence of God. However, in the modern era, atheistic and agnostic groups are increasing, and their movements are extensive and structured in advocating their ideologies. Hence, there is a need to reexamine the arguments of the scholars, presenting them more explicitly with updates and additional contemporary facts, both from scientific perspectives and the testimonies of atheists or agnostics who affirm the existence of God. The results of this research indicate that the existence of God is a truth easily provable through reason and logic that is inherently certain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
El-Mujtama Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47467/elmujtama.v4i5.3619
Primary Topic
Education and Character Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Argumentasi Rasional Eksistensi Tuhan

Mohamad Singgih Pamungkas
El-Mujtama Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Education and Character Development
article

Argumentasi Rasional Eksistensi Tuhan

Mohamad Singgih Pamungkas
article en

Abstract

This research aims to examine and reiterate the arguments used by Islamic scholars regarding the existence of God, by incorporating contemporary evidence supporting the validity of these arguments. Simultaneously, it aims to refute the atheist's assumption that the existence of God is impossible to scientifically prove. This study employs qualitative, descriptive, and analytical methods, along with a philosophical approach to the arguments presented in revelation and those used by Islamic scholars regarding the existence of God. The research is categorized as library research, drawing from classical and contemporary books, relevant scientific journals, or articles related to the study. Islamic scholars, based on the Quran and Sunnah, have put forth various rational arguments for the existence of God. However, in the modern era, atheistic and agnostic groups are increasing, and their movements are extensive and structured in advocating their ideologies. Hence, there is a need to reexamine the arguments of the scholars, presenting them more explicitly with updates and additional contemporary facts, both from scientific perspectives and the testimonies of atheists or agnostics who affirm the existence of God. The results of this research indicate that the existence of God is a truth easily provable through reason and logic that is inherently certain.

El-Mujtama Jurnal Pengabdian MasyarakatVol. 4(5)
New York Times (US), Intercultural Open University Foundation (US), International Open University, Hong Kong Metropolitan University (HK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Education and Character Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.