Making and measuring change in the food system: The perspectives of funders

Given the centrality of philanthropic funding to the work of nonprofit food access and food justice organizations, it is surprising how little we know about how foundations conceptualize and assess their grant-making across the food system. Based on an analysis of interviews with program officers at foundations that support food system interven­tions in New England, this paper describes founda­tions’ initial (and evolving) motivations for grant-making, the outcomes that they expect from investments, and the kinds of information that they see as convincing evidence for such outcomes. At the same time, it explores how program officers’ experiences of responding to the COVID-19 pan­demic and to contemporaneous calls to redress systemic racism have shaped their practices. This paper points to opportunities for new relationships between community-based organizations and foundations, especially as program officers ex­periment with practices of trust-based philan­thropy. It also highlights, however, the challenges posed by philanthropic board members’ assump­tions about quantifiable program outcomes and concerns about supporting overtly “political” work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2024.134.007
Primary Topic
Organic Food and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making and measuring change in the food system: The perspectives of funders

Sara Shostak
Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development
Organic Food and Agriculture
article

Making and measuring change in the food system: The perspectives of funders

Sara Shostak
article en

Abstract

Given the centrality of philanthropic funding to the work of nonprofit food access and food justice organizations, it is surprising how little we know about how foundations conceptualize and assess their grant-making across the food system. Based on an analysis of interviews with program officers at foundations that support food system interven­tions in New England, this paper describes founda­tions’ initial (and evolving) motivations for grant-making, the outcomes that they expect from investments, and the kinds of information that they see as convincing evidence for such outcomes. At the same time, it explores how program officers’ experiences of responding to the COVID-19 pan­demic and to contemporaneous calls to redress systemic racism have shaped their practices. This paper points to opportunities for new relationships between community-based organizations and foundations, especially as program officers ex­periment with practices of trust-based philan­thropy. It also highlights, however, the challenges posed by philanthropic board members’ assump­tions about quantifiable program outcomes and concerns about supporting overtly “political” work.

Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development
Brandeis University (US)
Brandeis University
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Organic Food and Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.