Mode of Instructional Delivery and Students’ Academic Performance in Mathematics and Non-mathematics Courses

This paper seeks to establish whether there is a statistically significant difference in students’ academic performance in mathematics and non-mathematics courses using face-to-face, online, and blended instruction. The study is quantitative research and employs a case study approach covering 603 students at the Catholic University of Ghana. The paired sampled t-test is adopted to analyze the data set. The study found that at a 5 percent significant level, there is no statistically significant difference in students’ academic performance in mathematics and non-mathematics courses using face-to-face instruction. Conversely, a statistically significant difference exists in students’ academic performance in mathematics and non-mathematics courses using online and blended instructions. The study concludes that non-mathematics courses can be best taught using online instruction whereas mathematics-related courses can best be taught using blended instruction. However, face-to-face instruction leads to no difference in students’ academic performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Tertiary Education and Learning
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54536/jtel.v2i3.3218
Primary Topic
Educational Innovations and Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mode of Instructional Delivery and Students’ Academic Performance in Mathematics and Non-mathematics Courses

Michael Opoku-Manu, Augustine Owusu-Addo, Anning Asafo Adjei, Akanzabwon Asaarik
Journal of Tertiary Education and Learning
Educational Innovations and Challenges
article

Mode of Instructional Delivery and Students’ Academic Performance in Mathematics and Non-mathematics Courses

Michael Opoku-Manu, Augustine Owusu-Addo, Anning Asafo Adjei, Akanzabwon Asaarik
article en

Abstract

This paper seeks to establish whether there is a statistically significant difference in students’ academic performance in mathematics and non-mathematics courses using face-to-face, online, and blended instruction. The study is quantitative research and employs a case study approach covering 603 students at the Catholic University of Ghana. The paired sampled t-test is adopted to analyze the data set. The study found that at a 5 percent significant level, there is no statistically significant difference in students’ academic performance in mathematics and non-mathematics courses using face-to-face instruction. Conversely, a statistically significant difference exists in students’ academic performance in mathematics and non-mathematics courses using online and blended instructions. The study concludes that non-mathematics courses can be best taught using online instruction whereas mathematics-related courses can best be taught using blended instruction. However, face-to-face instruction leads to no difference in students’ academic performance.

Journal of Tertiary Education and LearningVol. 2(3)
University of Ghana (GH), Catholic University College of Ghana (GH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Educational Innovations and Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.