Circular Polarization of Simulated Images of Black Holes

Abstract Models of the resolved Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) sources Sgr A* and M87* are constrained by observations at multiple wavelengths, resolutions, polarizations, and time cadences. In this paper, we compare unresolved circular polarization (CP) measurements to a library of models, where each model is characterized by a distribution of CP over time. In the library, we vary the spin of the black hole, the magnetic field strength at the horizon (i.e., both SANE and magnetically arrested disk or MAD models), the observer inclination, a parameter for the maximum ion–electron temperature ratio assuming a thermal plasma, and the direction of the magnetic field dipole moment. We find that Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) observations of Sgr A* are inconsistent with all edge-on ( i = 90°) models. Restricting attention to the MAD models favored by earlier EHT studies of Sgr A*, we find that only models with magnetic dipole moment pointing away from the observer are consistent with ALMA data. We also note that in 26 of the 27 passing MAD models, the accretion flow rotates clockwise on the sky. We provide a table of the means and standard deviations of the CP distributions for all model parameters, along with their trends.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad5b51
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circular Polarization of Simulated Images of Black Holes

Ben Prather, Chi‐kwan Chan, Charles F. Gammie, Maciek Wielgus et al.
7 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
2.32
article

Circular Polarization of Simulated Images of Black Holes

Ben Prather, Chi‐kwan Chan, Charles F. Gammie, Maciek Wielgus, Abhishek V. Joshi
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Models of the resolved Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) sources Sgr A* and M87* are constrained by observations at multiple wavelengths, resolutions, polarizations, and time cadences. In this paper, we compare unresolved circular polarization (CP) measurements to a library of models, where each model is characterized by a distribution of CP over time. In the library, we vary the spin of the black hole, the magnetic field strength at the horizon (i.e., both SANE and magnetically arrested disk or MAD models), the observer inclination, a parameter for the maximum ion–electron temperature ratio assuming a thermal plasma, and the direction of the magnetic field dipole moment. We find that Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) observations of Sgr A* are inconsistent with all edge-on ( i = 90°) models. Restricting attention to the MAD models favored by earlier EHT studies of Sgr A*, we find that only models with magnetic dipole moment pointing away from the observer are consistent with ALMA data. We also note that in 26 of the 27 passing MAD models, the accretion flow rotates clockwise on the sky. We provide a table of the means and standard deviations of the CP distributions for all model parameters, along with their trends.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 972(2)
Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), University of Arizona (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Applied Mathematics (United States) (US), National Center for Supercomputing Applications (US), Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy (DE)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, National Science Council, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Office of Science, European Research Council, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Argonne National Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
2.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.