EU–China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment: The impact of firm supply chains on firm value

This research adopts an event study approach to investigate the impact of the European Union (EU)–China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) negotiations on firm value. We emphasise two typical events during the process, i.e. the preliminary agreement and the suspension of the CAI, which result in completely distinct patterns of policy uncertainty for the EU and China. Using data from Chinese listed firms, we find that the Chinese stock market reacts positively to the preliminary agreement of the CAI but negatively to its suspension. A firm with global supply chains has better stock returns when exposed to the first event but no significant heterogeneity under the second event. We also find that these effects vary depending on the overseas experience of the CEO, firm ownership type, and whether the firm is in a high-tech industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic and Political Studies
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2024.2389660
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EU–China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment: The impact of firm supply chains on firm value

Tong Qi, Xinrui Lin, Kees C. G. Koedijk, Wenhui Qiang
1 citations
Economic and Political Studies
Global trade and economics
0.83
article

EU–China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment: The impact of firm supply chains on firm value

Tong Qi, Xinrui Lin, Kees C. G. Koedijk, Wenhui Qiang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This research adopts an event study approach to investigate the impact of the European Union (EU)–China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) negotiations on firm value. We emphasise two typical events during the process, i.e. the preliminary agreement and the suspension of the CAI, which result in completely distinct patterns of policy uncertainty for the EU and China. Using data from Chinese listed firms, we find that the Chinese stock market reacts positively to the preliminary agreement of the CAI but negatively to its suspension. A firm with global supply chains has better stock returns when exposed to the first event but no significant heterogeneity under the second event. We also find that these effects vary depending on the overseas experience of the CEO, firm ownership type, and whether the firm is in a high-tech industry.

Economic and Political StudiesVol. 12(4)
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN), Utrecht University (NL), East China Normal University (CN), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Global trade and economics
0.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

EU–China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment: The impact of firm supply chains on firm value — Tong Qi, Xinrui Lin, et al. · Economic and Political Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS