Implications of the Updated Lyon Consensus 2.0 in Clinical Practice

Over the past few decades, efforts have been made to refine the characterization of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and delineate accurate diagnostic criteria. The original Lyon Consensus published in 2018 defined conclusive diagnostic criteria for GERD, and its subsequent iteration, Lyon Consensus 2.0, provides an updated assessment for actionable GERD. We aim to review the modifications made to the updated consensus, review the supporting literature for said changes, and highlight how these changes may alter clinical practice. The key revisions in the updated consensus are the recommendations to discontinue antisecretory therapy before endoscopic grading, the modifications to endoscopic criteria for proven GERD, the incorporation of wireless pH testing parameters, and the establishment of the threshold for pH-impedance monitoring on antisecretory therapy. Apart from enhancing diagnostic reliability using conclusive and inconclusive thresholds for defining GERD, Lyon Consensus 2.0 provides medical and surgical clinicians the guidance they need to provide clear management pathways for patients with GERD symptoms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foregut The Journal of the American Foregut Society
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161241277568
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implications of the Updated Lyon Consensus 2.0 in Clinical Practice

Daniela Jodorkovsky, Mako Koseki, Kimberly Cavaliere, Yuying Luo et al.
1 citations
Foregut The Journal of the American Foregut Society
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
0.46
article

Implications of the Updated Lyon Consensus 2.0 in Clinical Practice

Daniela Jodorkovsky, Mako Koseki, Kimberly Cavaliere, Yuying Luo, Emily S Seltzer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Over the past few decades, efforts have been made to refine the characterization of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and delineate accurate diagnostic criteria. The original Lyon Consensus published in 2018 defined conclusive diagnostic criteria for GERD, and its subsequent iteration, Lyon Consensus 2.0, provides an updated assessment for actionable GERD. We aim to review the modifications made to the updated consensus, review the supporting literature for said changes, and highlight how these changes may alter clinical practice. The key revisions in the updated consensus are the recommendations to discontinue antisecretory therapy before endoscopic grading, the modifications to endoscopic criteria for proven GERD, the incorporation of wireless pH testing parameters, and the establishment of the threshold for pH-impedance monitoring on antisecretory therapy. Apart from enhancing diagnostic reliability using conclusive and inconclusive thresholds for defining GERD, Lyon Consensus 2.0 provides medical and surgical clinicians the guidance they need to provide clear management pathways for patients with GERD symptoms.

Foregut The Journal of the American Foregut SocietyVol. 5(1)
Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Implications of the Updated Lyon Consensus 2.0 in Clinical Practice — Daniela Jodorkovsky, Mako Koseki, et al. · Foregut The Journal of the American Foregut Society (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS