252. RIGHT GASTROEPIPLOIC ARTERY LENGTH DETERMINED ANASTOMOTIC LEAKRIGHT GASTROEPIPLOIC ARTERY LENGTH DETERMINED ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER-A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Abstract Background This prospective cohort study, conducted at a high-volume esophageal cancer center from July 2019 to July 2022, aimed to investigate the link between the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) length and anastomotic leakage (AL) rates following minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Real-world data on stomach blood supply in the Chinese population were examined. Materials and methods A total of 516 cases were enrolled, categorized into two groups based on the Youden index-determined optimal cut-off value for the relative length of RGEA (length of RGEA/length of gastric conduit, 64.69%) through ROC analysis: Group SR (short RGEA) and Group LR (long RGEA). The primary observation parameter was the relationship between AL incidence and the ratio of direct blood supply from RGEA. Secondary parameters included the mean length of the right gastroepiploic artery, greater curvature, and the connection type between right and left gastroepiploic vessels. Patient data were prospectively recorded in electronic case report forms. Results The study revealed median lengths of 43.60 cm for greater curvature, 43.16 cm for the gastric conduit, and 26.75 cm for RGEA. AL, the most common postoperative complication, showed a significant difference between groups (16.88% vs. 8.84%, p = 0.01). Multivariable binary logistic regression identified Group SR and LR (Odds ratio: 2.651, 95% CI: 1.124–6.250, p = 0.03) and Neoadjuvant therapy (Odds ratio: 2.479, 95% CI: 1.374–4.473, p = 0.00) as independent predictors of AL. Conclusions The study emphasizes the crucial role of RGEA length in determining AL incidence in MIE for esophageal cancer. Preserving RGEA and fostering capillary arches between RGEA and LGEA are recommended strategies to mitigate AL risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Esophagus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.034
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

252. RIGHT GASTROEPIPLOIC ARTERY LENGTH DETERMINED ANASTOMOTIC LEAKRIGHT GASTROEPIPLOIC ARTERY LENGTH DETERMINED ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER-A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Kun-Kun Li
Diseases of the Esophagus
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

252. RIGHT GASTROEPIPLOIC ARTERY LENGTH DETERMINED ANASTOMOTIC LEAKRIGHT GASTROEPIPLOIC ARTERY LENGTH DETERMINED ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE AFTER MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER-A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

Kun-Kun Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background This prospective cohort study, conducted at a high-volume esophageal cancer center from July 2019 to July 2022, aimed to investigate the link between the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) length and anastomotic leakage (AL) rates following minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). Real-world data on stomach blood supply in the Chinese population were examined. Materials and methods A total of 516 cases were enrolled, categorized into two groups based on the Youden index-determined optimal cut-off value for the relative length of RGEA (length of RGEA/length of gastric conduit, 64.69%) through ROC analysis: Group SR (short RGEA) and Group LR (long RGEA). The primary observation parameter was the relationship between AL incidence and the ratio of direct blood supply from RGEA. Secondary parameters included the mean length of the right gastroepiploic artery, greater curvature, and the connection type between right and left gastroepiploic vessels. Patient data were prospectively recorded in electronic case report forms. Results The study revealed median lengths of 43.60 cm for greater curvature, 43.16 cm for the gastric conduit, and 26.75 cm for RGEA. AL, the most common postoperative complication, showed a significant difference between groups (16.88% vs. 8.84%, p = 0.01). Multivariable binary logistic regression identified Group SR and LR (Odds ratio: 2.651, 95% CI: 1.124–6.250, p = 0.03) and Neoadjuvant therapy (Odds ratio: 2.479, 95% CI: 1.374–4.473, p = 0.00) as independent predictors of AL. Conclusions The study emphasizes the crucial role of RGEA length in determining AL incidence in MIE for esophageal cancer. Preserving RGEA and fostering capillary arches between RGEA and LGEA are recommended strategies to mitigate AL risk.

Diseases of the EsophagusVol. 37(Supplement_1)
Daping Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.