237. THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF NODAL SKIP METASTASIS IN PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

Abstract Background Nodal skip metastasis (NSM), a common form of lymphatic spread in esophageal cancer (EC), refers to metastatic involvement of distant lymph nodes (LNs) without prior engagement of adjacent LNs. Previous studies examining the association between NSM and survival outcomes in EC patients have yielded inconsistent and even contradictory results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the prognostic value of NSM and summarize NSM definitions used in prior studies. Methods Four databases were employed for this meta-analysis. The relationship between NSM and overall survival (OS) was assessed using pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity analysis and funnel plots were utilized to evaluate publication bias. Results This meta-analysis incorporated nine studies, and the pooled results revealed no significant association between NSM and OS (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.75–1.31; P = 0.951). Sub-group analyses based on histological features, method of lymphadenectomy, node staging system, and NSM definitions also failed to identify a significant association between NSM and OS. Conclusions Based on the available evidence, NSM cannot be considered a prognostic factor for EC patients. Future studies examining the prognostic value of NSM should focus on employing three-field lymphadenectomy with an adequate number of harvested LNs. NSM definitions based on lymph node station and anatomical compartment could both serve as feasible classifications for EC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Esophagus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.024
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

237. THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF NODAL SKIP METASTASIS IN PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

Xiaokun Li, Yong Yuan
Diseases of the Esophagus
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

237. THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF NODAL SKIP METASTASIS IN PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

Xiaokun Li, Yong Yuan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Nodal skip metastasis (NSM), a common form of lymphatic spread in esophageal cancer (EC), refers to metastatic involvement of distant lymph nodes (LNs) without prior engagement of adjacent LNs. Previous studies examining the association between NSM and survival outcomes in EC patients have yielded inconsistent and even contradictory results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the prognostic value of NSM and summarize NSM definitions used in prior studies. Methods Four databases were employed for this meta-analysis. The relationship between NSM and overall survival (OS) was assessed using pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity analysis and funnel plots were utilized to evaluate publication bias. Results This meta-analysis incorporated nine studies, and the pooled results revealed no significant association between NSM and OS (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.75–1.31; P = 0.951). Sub-group analyses based on histological features, method of lymphadenectomy, node staging system, and NSM definitions also failed to identify a significant association between NSM and OS. Conclusions Based on the available evidence, NSM cannot be considered a prognostic factor for EC patients. Future studies examining the prognostic value of NSM should focus on employing three-field lymphadenectomy with an adequate number of harvested LNs. NSM definitions based on lymph node station and anatomical compartment could both serve as feasible classifications for EC.

Diseases of the EsophagusVol. 37(Supplement_1)
Sichuan University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.