Challenges of Monitoring Obligations in the European Union’s Digital Services Act

The article argues that the Digital Services Act, as part of the EU’s broader attempt to regulate intermediary services providers in a constantly growing and challenging technological, social and political environment, does not provide a final and comprehensive solution to the issue. The Digital Services Act appears inconsistent with the previous case law of European supranational judiciary forums regarding the prohibitionofgeneralmonitoringbyintermediary services providers.Infact,itprovides the Member States with vaguely worded regulatory exceptions in the event of a ban on general monitoring. However, the Digital Services Act can be seen as a legitimate and necessary attempt to enforce the regulation at the European level through Member States while at the same time giving a unique regulatory position in specific cases to the European Commission or pan-European legal bodies in general. Finally, the Digital Services Act also turns initial enforced self-regulatory attempts to regulate social harms, possibly caused by intermediary services providers, into co-regulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ELTE Law Journal
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54148/eltelj.2024.1.45
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
28.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges of Monitoring Obligations in the European Union’s Digital Services Act

Ewa Galewska, Gergely Gosztonyi, Andrej Školkay
7 citations
ELTE Law Journal
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
28.52
article

Challenges of Monitoring Obligations in the European Union’s Digital Services Act

Ewa Galewska, Gergely Gosztonyi, Andrej Školkay
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The article argues that the Digital Services Act, as part of the EU’s broader attempt to regulate intermediary services providers in a constantly growing and challenging technological, social and political environment, does not provide a final and comprehensive solution to the issue. The Digital Services Act appears inconsistent with the previous case law of European supranational judiciary forums regarding the prohibitionofgeneralmonitoringbyintermediary services providers.Infact,itprovides the Member States with vaguely worded regulatory exceptions in the event of a ban on general monitoring. However, the Digital Services Act can be seen as a legitimate and necessary attempt to enforce the regulation at the European level through Member States while at the same time giving a unique regulatory position in specific cases to the European Commission or pan-European legal bodies in general. Finally, the Digital Services Act also turns initial enforced self-regulatory attempts to regulate social harms, possibly caused by intermediary services providers, into co-regulation.

ELTE Law Journal(1)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), University of Wrocław (PL), Asociácia Doktorandov Slovenska (SK)
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
28.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.