368. THE ROLE OF PG-SGA SCORE IN PREDICTING SHORT- TERM POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER SURGERY
Abstract Background The preoperative nutritional status is increasingly recognized as a determinant of postoperative outcomes in esophageal cancer patients. This study examines the relationship between preoperative nutritional scores, particularly the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), and the incidence of short-term postoperative complications. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted on patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer across two Surgical Departments at University Hospitals in Athens, Greece. Preoperative nutritional status was assessed using the PG-SGA score. Patients were categorized based on the PG-SGA score into low to medium risk with score of 8 or less, and high risk with score of 9 or higher. Postoperative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system, and their association with nutritional status was statistically assessed. Results This study included 59 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer with female-to-male ratio of 1:4.9 and a median age of 65.4 ± 10.4 years, 43 (72.9%) of whom had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Notable postoperative complications (Clavien- Dindo classification ≥III) occurred in 14 cases, including evisceration (n=1), hemorrhage (n=1), chyle leakage (n=1), anastomotic leak (n=8), pleural effusion requiring radiological intervention (n=2), and a persistent pneumothorax necessitating additional thoracic tube insertion (n=1). A statistically significant association was found between malnutrition, as indicated by the PG-SGA≥9, and the development of severe postoperative complications (Clavien- Dindo classification ≥III) (p = 0.034). Conclusion This study suggests that preoperative PG-SGA score is potentially significant predictors of short- term postoperative complications in esophageal cancer surgeries. Incorporating nutritional assessments into the preoperative evaluation may help identify high-risk patients and tailor perioperative care to improve surgical outcomes.
Authors
- Maria Kyriakidou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7459-4524)
- Dimitriοs Schizas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7046-0112)
- Eva Karanikki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2590-2389)
- Maximos Frountzas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9157-9860)
- Irene Lidoriki (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4608-9621)
- Adam Mylonakis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0272-3259)
- Alexandros Kozadinos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9464-8400)
- Dimitrios Theodorou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5997-8490)
- Konstantinos G. Toutouzas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7830-6945)
- Ilianna Tsikrikou
Institutions
- Boston University (US)
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- Laiko General Hospital of Athens (GR)
- Hippocration General Hospital (GR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Diseases of the Esophagus
- Published
- 2024-09-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.127
- Primary Topic
- Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00