295. SAFETY OF SURVEILLANCE GASTROSCOPY AND ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE OESOPHAGUS AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY: RESULTS FROM THE SANO COHORT

Abstract Background An organ sparing strategy has been proposed for patients with oesophageal cancer and a clinically complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This active surveillance strategy involves (repeated) oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) with bite-on-bite biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). The preSANO trial and preliminary results of the SANO trial concluded that these procedures are safe to identify those with a clinically complete response. However, the safety of these procedures beyond that timeframe remains unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the safety of endoscopic procedures after nCRT, extending beyond three months. Methods This is a retrospective multicentre cohort study. All patients who participated in the pre-SANO and SANO studies were included. All were treated with CROSS nCRT for oesophageal cancer and underwent (repeated) endoscopic response evaluations (OGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and/or EUS with fine needle aspiration, as indicated). Primary outcome was serious adverse events (SAE) as defined by Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) associated with endoscopic procedures which include (but are not limited to) bleeding, infection and perforation. Secondary outcome included mechanical injury. Results A total of 919 patients underwent at least one endoscopic response evaluation. Some 2355 endoscopic procedures (61% OGD with EUS combined, 33% OGD and 6% EUS) were performed. Of these, 819 (35%) were performed more than three months after nCRT. SAEs were reported for five endoscopic procedures (0.2%) and included three cases of gastrointestinal bleeding after OGD with biopsies and two cases with infection secondary to the endoscopic procedures. No significant difference in SAEs was found between the procedures conducted before and more than three months after nCRT (2 vs. 3, OR 2.8, 95% CI, 0.3 – 33.7, P = 0.35). Conclusion OGD with biopsies and EUS are both procedures which can be safely performed after nCRT during an active surveillance strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Esophagus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.066
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

295. SAFETY OF SURVEILLANCE GASTROSCOPY AND ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE OESOPHAGUS AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY: RESULTS FROM THE SANO COHORT

Jolanda van Dieren, Lieke Hol, Wouter L. Curvers, BasPL Wijnhoven et al.
Diseases of the Esophagus
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

295. SAFETY OF SURVEILLANCE GASTROSCOPY AND ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE OESOPHAGUS AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY: RESULTS FROM THE SANO COHORT

Jolanda van Dieren, Lieke Hol, Wouter L. Curvers, BasPL Wijnhoven, Pieter Christiaan van der Sluis, Bianca Mostert, Liekele E. Oostenbrug, Manon C.W. Spaander, Eva Kouw, Judith Honing, Tanya M. Bisseling, Jolein van der Kraan, Rutger Quispel, Sjoerd M. Lagarde, A. Van der Linden, Sietske Corporaal, Low Kuan Yean, Joost J. Nuyttens, S Panday, Jan JB van Lanschot, Wouter L. Hazen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background An organ sparing strategy has been proposed for patients with oesophageal cancer and a clinically complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This active surveillance strategy involves (repeated) oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) with bite-on-bite biopsies and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). The preSANO trial and preliminary results of the SANO trial concluded that these procedures are safe to identify those with a clinically complete response. However, the safety of these procedures beyond that timeframe remains unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the safety of endoscopic procedures after nCRT, extending beyond three months. Methods This is a retrospective multicentre cohort study. All patients who participated in the pre-SANO and SANO studies were included. All were treated with CROSS nCRT for oesophageal cancer and underwent (repeated) endoscopic response evaluations (OGD with bite-on-bite biopsies and/or EUS with fine needle aspiration, as indicated). Primary outcome was serious adverse events (SAE) as defined by Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) associated with endoscopic procedures which include (but are not limited to) bleeding, infection and perforation. Secondary outcome included mechanical injury. Results A total of 919 patients underwent at least one endoscopic response evaluation. Some 2355 endoscopic procedures (61% OGD with EUS combined, 33% OGD and 6% EUS) were performed. Of these, 819 (35%) were performed more than three months after nCRT. SAEs were reported for five endoscopic procedures (0.2%) and included three cases of gastrointestinal bleeding after OGD with biopsies and two cases with infection secondary to the endoscopic procedures. No significant difference in SAEs was found between the procedures conducted before and more than three months after nCRT (2 vs. 3, OR 2.8, 95% CI, 0.3 – 33.7, P = 0.35). Conclusion OGD with biopsies and EUS are both procedures which can be safely performed after nCRT during an active surveillance strategy.

Diseases of the EsophagusVol. 37(Supplement_1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Gelre Hospitals (NL), Catharina Ziekenhuis (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL), Reinier de Graaf Hospital (NL), Maasstad Ziekenhuis (NL), Zuyderland Medisch Centrum (NL), Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis (NL), Ziekenhuis Groep Twente (NL), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.