Identifying motivational interviewing techniques in Quitline smoking cessation counselling sessions from Queensland, Australia
Motivational interviewing (MI) is a common approach for smoking cessation counselling, yet little is known about the use of MI techniques in practice. This qualitative content analysis applied a published classification of content and relational MI techniques to a sample of 30 Quitline transcripts (January-March 2019) from Queensland, Australia. Overall, 36 MI techniques (94.7%) were identified at least once within the total sample. On average, 20 techniques (52.6%) were used in an individual conversation with a small difference observed between initial and follow-up calls. Techniques most frequently applied across conversations were largely relational, while techniques addressing client ambivalence/resistance were less frequently/never applied. Variability in techniques between individual initial and follow-up calls highlights the high degree of personalisation when applying MI to smoking cessation. Further investigations exploring associations of individual techniques and cessation outcomes are warranted. The classification may prove useful for assessments of fidelity for training and monitoring activities.
Authors
- David Ireland (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2189-4624)
- Henry Marshall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9626-8014)
- CORAL E. GARTNER (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6651-8035)
- Hollie Bendotti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5078-4809)
- Sheleigh Lawler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5771-0551)
Institutions
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Prince Charles Hospital (AU)
- Australian e-Health Research Centre (AU)
- National Health and Medical Research Council (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Health Psychology
- Published
- 2024-09-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241274091
- Primary Topic
- Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Queensland Health
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
- Prince Charles Hospital Foundation
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council