‘Setting the Benchmark’ Part 4: Contextualising the MatchDemands of Teams at the FIFA Women’s World Cup Australiaand New Zealand 2023

The aims of the present study were to: (1) analyse the upper and lower match physical performance benchmarks and variability of teams at the FIFA Women's World Cup Australia and New Zealand 2023, (2) examine the evolving team sprint ranking across three Women's World Cups and (3) investigate noteworthy relationships between collective physical and tactical metrics. With FIFA's official approval, all sixty-four games at the tournament were analysed using an optical tracking system alongside FIFA's Enhanced Football Intelligence metrics. On average, teams at the FIFA Women's World Cup 2023 covered 103.3 ± 4.4 km in total, with 6.7 ± 0.6 km and 1.9 ± 0.3 km covered at the higher intensities (≥19.0 & ≥23.0 km · h<sup>-1</sup>), respectively. The top five ranked teams from a high-intensity running perspective (Zambia, Spain, Brazil, Canada, Denmark) covered 24-44% more distance than the bottom five ranked teams (Jamaica, Columbia, Costa Rica, Switzerland, Vietnam) at the tournament (<i>P</i> < 0.01; Effect Size [ES]: 2.3-2.5). Match-to-match variation of teams revealed Italy and Panama were particularly consistent for the distances covered at higher intensities (Coefficient of Variation [CV]: 0.3-4.5%), while Costa Rica demonstrated considerable variation (CV: 23.4-40.7%). Teams generally covered more total distance on a per-minute basis in the first versus the second half (<i>P</i> < 0.01; ES: 1.1), but no differences existed at higher intensities (<i>P</i> > 0.05; ES: 0.1-0.2). Correlations were found between the number of high-intensity runs and various phase of play events for defensive transitions and recoveries, in addition to progressions up the pitch and into the final third (<i>r</i> = 0.48-0.88; <i>P</i> < 0.01). A basic comparative analysis revealed Spain demonstrated the most pronounced increase (2015 = 9<sup>th</sup>, 2019 = 35<sup>th</sup>, 2023 = 90<sup>th</sup> percentile; CV: 92.6%) and China PR the most marked decrease (2015 = 22<sup>nd</sup>, 2019 = 30<sup>th</sup>, 2023 = 0 percentile; CV: 89.6%) in their sprinting percentile rank across the last three FIFA Women's World Cups. The present findings provide a depiction of the current collective demands of international women's football. This information could be useful for practitioners to benchmark team performances and to potentially understand the myriad of contextual factors impacting physical performances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology of Sport
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2025.142638
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Setting the Benchmark’ Part 4: Contextualising the MatchDemands of Teams at the FIFA Women’s World Cup Australiaand New Zealand 2023

Paul S. Bradley
9 citations
Biology of Sport
Sports Analytics and Performance
10.16
article

‘Setting the Benchmark’ Part 4: Contextualising the MatchDemands of Teams at the FIFA Women’s World Cup Australiaand New Zealand 2023

Paul S. Bradley
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to: (1) analyse the upper and lower match physical performance benchmarks and variability of teams at the FIFA Women's World Cup Australia and New Zealand 2023, (2) examine the evolving team sprint ranking across three Women's World Cups and (3) investigate noteworthy relationships between collective physical and tactical metrics. With FIFA's official approval, all sixty-four games at the tournament were analysed using an optical tracking system alongside FIFA's Enhanced Football Intelligence metrics. On average, teams at the FIFA Women's World Cup 2023 covered 103.3 ± 4.4 km in total, with 6.7 ± 0.6 km and 1.9 ± 0.3 km covered at the higher intensities (≥19.0 & ≥23.0 km · h<sup>-1</sup>), respectively. The top five ranked teams from a high-intensity running perspective (Zambia, Spain, Brazil, Canada, Denmark) covered 24-44% more distance than the bottom five ranked teams (Jamaica, Columbia, Costa Rica, Switzerland, Vietnam) at the tournament (<i>P</i> < 0.01; Effect Size [ES]: 2.3-2.5). Match-to-match variation of teams revealed Italy and Panama were particularly consistent for the distances covered at higher intensities (Coefficient of Variation [CV]: 0.3-4.5%), while Costa Rica demonstrated considerable variation (CV: 23.4-40.7%). Teams generally covered more total distance on a per-minute basis in the first versus the second half (<i>P</i> < 0.01; ES: 1.1), but no differences existed at higher intensities (<i>P</i> > 0.05; ES: 0.1-0.2). Correlations were found between the number of high-intensity runs and various phase of play events for defensive transitions and recoveries, in addition to progressions up the pitch and into the final third (<i>r</i> = 0.48-0.88; <i>P</i> < 0.01). A basic comparative analysis revealed Spain demonstrated the most pronounced increase (2015 = 9<sup>th</sup>, 2019 = 35<sup>th</sup>, 2023 = 90<sup>th</sup> percentile; CV: 92.6%) and China PR the most marked decrease (2015 = 22<sup>nd</sup>, 2019 = 30<sup>th</sup>, 2023 = 0 percentile; CV: 89.6%) in their sprinting percentile rank across the last three FIFA Women's World Cups. The present findings provide a depiction of the current collective demands of international women's football. This information could be useful for practitioners to benchmark team performances and to potentially understand the myriad of contextual factors impacting physical performances.

Biology of SportVol. 42(2)
Fédération Internationale de Football Association (CH)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Sports Analytics and Performance
10.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.