Slicing the gordian knot of political extremism: Issues and potential solutions regarding its conceptualization and terminology

The main goal of the present work is to highlight the problems surrounding the current definition of political extremism and the misuse of this and other related terms like radicalism and radicalization. It is argued that these issues generate confusion and obscure research efforts regarding these phenomena. We identify four major problems regarding the terminology used to describe the phenomenon of political extremism: a polysemy problem, an inadequate equivalence between the terms extremism and radicalism, uncertainty about the role of violence in defining political extremism, and the fact that the term ‘radicalization’ is more closely associated with extremists rather than radicals. We describe how these problems affect both research on extremism and hinder its application and we propose potential solutions for such issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.12989
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Slicing the gordian knot of political extremism: Issues and potential solutions regarding its conceptualization and terminology

Mónica Álzate, José Manuel Sabucedo Cameselle, Marcos Dono
2 citations
Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
2.26
article

Slicing the gordian knot of political extremism: Issues and potential solutions regarding its conceptualization and terminology

Mónica Álzate, José Manuel Sabucedo Cameselle, Marcos Dono
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The main goal of the present work is to highlight the problems surrounding the current definition of political extremism and the misuse of this and other related terms like radicalism and radicalization. It is argued that these issues generate confusion and obscure research efforts regarding these phenomena. We identify four major problems regarding the terminology used to describe the phenomenon of political extremism: a polysemy problem, an inadequate equivalence between the terms extremism and radicalism, uncertainty about the role of violence in defining political extremism, and the fact that the term ‘radicalization’ is more closely associated with extremists rather than radicals. We describe how these problems affect both research on extremism and hinder its application and we propose potential solutions for such issues.

Journal of Social and Political PsychologyVol. 12(1)
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Slicing the gordian knot of political extremism: Issues and potential solutions regarding its conceptualization and terminology — Mónica Álzate, José Manuel Sabucedo Cameselle, et al. · Journal of Social and Political Psychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS