Enhanced Rubber Yield Prediction in High-Density Plantation Areas Using a GIS and Machine Learning-Based Forest Classification and Regression Model

Rubber is a perennial plant grown for natural rubber production, which is used in various global products. Ensuring the sustainability of rubber cultivation is crucial for smallholder farmers and economic development. Accurately predicting rubber yields is necessary to maintain price stability. Remote sensing technology is a valuable tool for collecting spatial data on a large scale. However, for smaller plots of land owned by smallholder farmers, it is necessary to process productivity estimates from high-resolution satellite data that are accurate and reliable. This study examines the impact of spatial factors on rubber yield and evaluates the technical suitability of using grouping analysis with the forest classification and regression (FCR) method. We developed a high-density variable using spatial data from rubber plots in close proximity to each other. Our approach incorporates eight environmental variables (proximity to streamlines, proximity to main river, soil drainage, slope, aspect, NDWI, NDVI, and precipitation) using an FCR model and GIS. We obtained a dataset of 1951 rubber yield locations, which we split into a training set (60%) for model development and a validation set (40%) for assessment using area under the curve (AUC) analysis. The results of the alternative FCR models indicate that Model 1 performs the best. It achieved the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) value of 19.15 kg/ha, the highest R-squared (R2) value (FCR) of 0.787, and also the highest R2 (OLS) value of 0.642. The AUC scores for Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3 were 0.792, 0.764, and 0.732, respectively. Overall, Model 4 exhibited the highest performance according to the AUC scores, while Model 3 performed the poorest with the lowest AUC score. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that Model 1 is the most effective in predicting FCR compared to the other alternative models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f15091535
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced Rubber Yield Prediction in High-Density Plantation Areas Using a GIS and Machine Learning-Based Forest Classification and Regression Model

Nutchanat Buasri, D. C. Slack, Narueset Prasertsri, Benjamabhorn Pumhirunroj et al.
4 citations
Forests
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.84
article

Enhanced Rubber Yield Prediction in High-Density Plantation Areas Using a GIS and Machine Learning-Based Forest Classification and Regression Model

Nutchanat Buasri, D. C. Slack, Narueset Prasertsri, Benjamabhorn Pumhirunroj, Patiwat Littidej, Satith Sangpradid, Winyoo Kromkratoke
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Rubber is a perennial plant grown for natural rubber production, which is used in various global products. Ensuring the sustainability of rubber cultivation is crucial for smallholder farmers and economic development. Accurately predicting rubber yields is necessary to maintain price stability. Remote sensing technology is a valuable tool for collecting spatial data on a large scale. However, for smaller plots of land owned by smallholder farmers, it is necessary to process productivity estimates from high-resolution satellite data that are accurate and reliable. This study examines the impact of spatial factors on rubber yield and evaluates the technical suitability of using grouping analysis with the forest classification and regression (FCR) method. We developed a high-density variable using spatial data from rubber plots in close proximity to each other. Our approach incorporates eight environmental variables (proximity to streamlines, proximity to main river, soil drainage, slope, aspect, NDWI, NDVI, and precipitation) using an FCR model and GIS. We obtained a dataset of 1951 rubber yield locations, which we split into a training set (60%) for model development and a validation set (40%) for assessment using area under the curve (AUC) analysis. The results of the alternative FCR models indicate that Model 1 performs the best. It achieved the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) value of 19.15 kg/ha, the highest R-squared (R2) value (FCR) of 0.787, and also the highest R2 (OLS) value of 0.642. The AUC scores for Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3 were 0.792, 0.764, and 0.732, respectively. Overall, Model 4 exhibited the highest performance according to the AUC scores, while Model 3 performed the poorest with the lowest AUC score. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that Model 1 is the most effective in predicting FCR compared to the other alternative models.

ForestsVol. 15(9)
Mahasarakham University (TH), University of Arizona (US), Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University (TH)
Mahasarakham University
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.