Historical Welfare Dynamics of the USSR Republics in the Light of Anthropometric Data: Convergence or Divergence?

The historiography of the dynamics of well-being in Soviet republics remains a subject of discussion, particularly with regard to the patterns of convergence or divergence in living standards and the stages at which these processes were predominant. A variety of socio-economic indicators are employed for assessment, including GDP per capita, real incomes, public expenditure, consumption, housing provision, and life expectancy. However, the sources utilized for the study of these parameters are often imperfect. In recent decades, anthropometric data have been employed as an indicator of well-being. Historical anthropometry has demonstrated that average human height (stature) serves as a sensitive and comprehensive measure of biological well-being. The objective of this article is to examine the processes of convergence and divergence in the well-being of Soviet republics through the lens of anthropometric data. The findings indicate that while the early decades of the USSR were characterized by convergence in average height and biological well-being, the last decades were characterized by the intensification of divergence among the Soviet republics. Inequality increased between the western and southeastern regions of the USSR. The conclusions derived from anthropometric data are supplied by other indicators and factors of well-being. The analysis highlights the significance of demographic models and sociocultural factors, alongside government policies, in influencing trends of convergence and divergence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Frontier Studies
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46539/jfs.v9i3.629
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Socioeconomic and Demographic Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Historical Welfare Dynamics of the USSR Republics in the Light of Anthropometric Data: Convergence or Divergence?

I. I. Verni︠a︡ev
2 citations
Journal of Frontier Studies
Socioeconomic and Demographic Analysis
1.42
article

Historical Welfare Dynamics of the USSR Republics in the Light of Anthropometric Data: Convergence or Divergence?

I. I. Verni︠a︡ev
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The historiography of the dynamics of well-being in Soviet republics remains a subject of discussion, particularly with regard to the patterns of convergence or divergence in living standards and the stages at which these processes were predominant. A variety of socio-economic indicators are employed for assessment, including GDP per capita, real incomes, public expenditure, consumption, housing provision, and life expectancy. However, the sources utilized for the study of these parameters are often imperfect. In recent decades, anthropometric data have been employed as an indicator of well-being. Historical anthropometry has demonstrated that average human height (stature) serves as a sensitive and comprehensive measure of biological well-being. The objective of this article is to examine the processes of convergence and divergence in the well-being of Soviet republics through the lens of anthropometric data. The findings indicate that while the early decades of the USSR were characterized by convergence in average height and biological well-being, the last decades were characterized by the intensification of divergence among the Soviet republics. Inequality increased between the western and southeastern regions of the USSR. The conclusions derived from anthropometric data are supplied by other indicators and factors of well-being. The analysis highlights the significance of demographic models and sociocultural factors, alongside government policies, in influencing trends of convergence and divergence.

Journal of Frontier StudiesVol. 9(3)
St Petersburg University (RU)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Socioeconomic and Demographic Analysis
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.