Compromise in Human-Robot Collaboration for Threat Assessment

Advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) will produce “reasonable disagreements” between human operators and machine partners. A simulation study investigated factors that may influence compromise between human and robot partners when they disagree in situation evaluation. Eighty-seven participants viewed urban scenes and interacted with a robot partner to make a threat assessment. We explored the impacts of multiple factors on threat ratings and trust, including how the robot communicated with the person, and whether or not the robot compromised following dialogue. Results showed that participants were open to compromise with the robot, especially when the robot detected threat in a seemingly safe scene. Unexpectedly, dialogue with the robot and hearing robot inner speech reduced compromise and trust, relative to control conditions providing transparency or signaling benevolence. Dialogue may change the human’s perception of the robot’s role in the team, indicating a design challenge for design of future systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813241276449
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compromise in Human-Robot Collaboration for Threat Assessment

Arianna Pipitone, Ryon Cumings, Antonio Chella, April Rose Panganiban et al.
2 citations
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.05
article

Compromise in Human-Robot Collaboration for Threat Assessment

Arianna Pipitone, Ryon Cumings, Antonio Chella, April Rose Panganiban, James R. Casey, Mustapha Mouloua, Jinchao Lin, Gerald Matthews
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) will produce “reasonable disagreements” between human operators and machine partners. A simulation study investigated factors that may influence compromise between human and robot partners when they disagree in situation evaluation. Eighty-seven participants viewed urban scenes and interacted with a robot partner to make a threat assessment. We explored the impacts of multiple factors on threat ratings and trust, including how the robot communicated with the person, and whether or not the robot compromised following dialogue. Results showed that participants were open to compromise with the robot, especially when the robot detected threat in a seemingly safe scene. Unexpectedly, dialogue with the robot and hearing robot inner speech reduced compromise and trust, relative to control conditions providing transparency or signaling benevolence. Dialogue may change the human’s perception of the robot’s role in the team, indicating a design challenge for design of future systems.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 68(1)
University of Central Florida (US), United States Air Force Research Laboratory (US), George Mason University (US), University of Palermo (IT)
Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.