Balancing allocative and dynamic efficiency with redundant <scp>R&amp;D</scp> allocation: <scp>Th</scp>e role of organizational proximity and centralization

Abstract Research Summary Resource‐based‐view scholars have mainly examined two resource allocation approaches for competitive advantage in multiunit firms: resource sharing and resource redeployment. These approaches emphasize allocative efficiency—the optimal allocation of resources to maximize their current value. In technology‐intensive industries, firm success also requires achieving dynamic efficiency to increase its future value‐creation. We propose that the redundant allocation of resources—the parallel deployment of non‐scale‐free resources towards the same objective—although allocatively inefficient, increases dynamic efficiency by stimulating inter‐unit competition. Firms' structural features moderate these effects. An analysis of large pharmaceutical firms reveals that redundant R&amp;D increases innovations with high firm‐specific value but simultaneously increases project terminations to reduce wastage. Organizational proximity increases the former effect and decreases the latter. Firm's R&amp;D centralization amplifies the effect of unit proximity. Managerial Summary In technology‐intensive industries, multiunit firms often employ redundant allocation of R&amp;D resources, that is, the parallel deployment of scientists and equipment in different units towards realizing the same business objective. Although common, there is little managerial guidance on how this practice impacts firms' R&amp;D outcomes, and how organizational characteristics influence this relationship. An analysis of large pharmaceutical firms reveals that redundant allocation of R&amp;D resources across units increases wastage but also stimulates competing units to create innovations with high firm‐specific value. Organizationally proximate units are less likely to have their redundant projects terminated, while creating more high‐value‐innovations. Centralization of the firm's R&amp;D amplifies the effect of unit proximity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategic Management Journal
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3662
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing allocative and dynamic efficiency with redundant R&D allocation: The role of organizational proximity and centralization

Kannan Srikanth, Anand Nandkumar, Vivek Tandon, Ronak Mogra
5 citations
Strategic Management Journal
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
2.45
article

Balancing allocative and dynamic efficiency with redundant R&D allocation: The role of organizational proximity and centralization

Kannan Srikanth, Anand Nandkumar, Vivek Tandon, Ronak Mogra
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Research Summary Resource‐based‐view scholars have mainly examined two resource allocation approaches for competitive advantage in multiunit firms: resource sharing and resource redeployment. These approaches emphasize allocative efficiency—the optimal allocation of resources to maximize their current value. In technology‐intensive industries, firm success also requires achieving dynamic efficiency to increase its future value‐creation. We propose that the redundant allocation of resources—the parallel deployment of non‐scale‐free resources towards the same objective—although allocatively inefficient, increases dynamic efficiency by stimulating inter‐unit competition. Firms' structural features moderate these effects. An analysis of large pharmaceutical firms reveals that redundant R&amp;D increases innovations with high firm‐specific value but simultaneously increases project terminations to reduce wastage. Organizational proximity increases the former effect and decreases the latter. Firm's R&amp;D centralization amplifies the effect of unit proximity. Managerial Summary In technology‐intensive industries, multiunit firms often employ redundant allocation of R&amp;D resources, that is, the parallel deployment of scientists and equipment in different units towards realizing the same business objective. Although common, there is little managerial guidance on how this practice impacts firms' R&amp;D outcomes, and how organizational characteristics influence this relationship. An analysis of large pharmaceutical firms reveals that redundant allocation of R&amp;D resources across units increases wastage but also stimulates competing units to create innovations with high firm‐specific value. Organizationally proximate units are less likely to have their redundant projects terminated, while creating more high‐value‐innovations. Centralization of the firm's R&amp;D amplifies the effect of unit proximity.

Strategic Management Journal
Indian School of Business (IN), Fisher College (US), INSEAD (SG), The Ohio State University (US), Temple University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
2.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.