A COMPARATIVE ETUDY OF ALVEOLAR BONE CHANGES AND APICAL ROOT RESORPTION BETWEEN CLEAR ALIGNERS AND FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES

Introduction: The capabilities of fixed orthodontic appliance (FA) treatment paved the way to making it the most popular orthodontic appliance. \ Objective: The main objective of the study is to find the comparison of alveolar bone changes and apical root resorption between clear aligners and fixed orthodontic appliances. Methodology: This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted at Dar ul Sehat hospital during January 2023 to March 2024. Data were collected from 155 patients according to objectives of the study. Data collection focused on measuring changes in alveolar bone density and apical root resorption, which were assessed at three time points: baseline (before treatment), mid-treatment (6 months), and post-treatment (upon completion of orthodontic treatment). Results: The results indicate that both treatment groups experienced reductions in bone density and volume over time, with Group B (fixed appliances) showing a more significant decrease than Group A (clear aligners). By the end of treatment, Group A had a bone density of 890 HU and bone volume of 0.22 cm³, while Group B had a bone density of 870 HU and bone volume of 0.20 cm³. At baseline, root lengths were similar between the groups, but by the end of treatment, Group A (clear aligners) had a mean root length of 13.8 mm, while Group B's mean root length decreased to 13.2 mm. Conclusion: It is concluded that clear aligners are associated with less alveolar bone loss and reduced risk of apical root resorption compared to fixed orthodontic appliances.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53555/x1kx7275
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A COMPARATIVE ETUDY OF ALVEOLAR BONE CHANGES AND APICAL ROOT RESORPTION BETWEEN CLEAR ALIGNERS AND FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES

Dr Muhammad Atae Mustafa Mahayyudin
1 citations
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
0.40
article

A COMPARATIVE ETUDY OF ALVEOLAR BONE CHANGES AND APICAL ROOT RESORPTION BETWEEN CLEAR ALIGNERS AND FIXED ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES

Dr Muhammad Atae Mustafa Mahayyudin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: The capabilities of fixed orthodontic appliance (FA) treatment paved the way to making it the most popular orthodontic appliance. \ Objective: The main objective of the study is to find the comparison of alveolar bone changes and apical root resorption between clear aligners and fixed orthodontic appliances. Methodology: This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted at Dar ul Sehat hospital during January 2023 to March 2024. Data were collected from 155 patients according to objectives of the study. Data collection focused on measuring changes in alveolar bone density and apical root resorption, which were assessed at three time points: baseline (before treatment), mid-treatment (6 months), and post-treatment (upon completion of orthodontic treatment). Results: The results indicate that both treatment groups experienced reductions in bone density and volume over time, with Group B (fixed appliances) showing a more significant decrease than Group A (clear aligners). By the end of treatment, Group A had a bone density of 890 HU and bone volume of 0.22 cm³, while Group B had a bone density of 870 HU and bone volume of 0.20 cm³. At baseline, root lengths were similar between the groups, but by the end of treatment, Group A (clear aligners) had a mean root length of 13.8 mm, while Group B's mean root length decreased to 13.2 mm. Conclusion: It is concluded that clear aligners are associated with less alveolar bone loss and reduced risk of apical root resorption compared to fixed orthodontic appliances.

Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.