Safety and Immunogenicity of the Intranasal Vaccine Candidate Mambisa and the Intramuscular Vaccine Abdala Used as Booster Doses for COVID-19 Convalescents: A Randomized Phase 1–2 Clinical Trial

A phase 1-2, prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial (Code RPCEC00000382), with parallel groups, involving 1161 participants, was designed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of two Cuban COVID-19 vaccines (Mambisa and Abdala) in boosting COVID-19 immunity of convalescent adults after receiving one dose of either vaccine. The main safety outcome was severe vaccination adverse events occurring in <5% of vaccinees. Main immunogenicity success endpoints were a ≥4-fold anti-RBD IgG seroconversion or a ≥20% increase in ACE2-RBD inhibitory antibodies in >55% of vaccinees in Phase 1 and >70% in Phase 2. Neutralizing antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 variants were evaluated. Both vaccines were safe-no deaths or severe adverse events occurred. Mild intensity adverse events were the most frequent (>73%); headaches predominated for both vaccines. Phase 1 responders were 83.3% (<i>p</i> = 0.0018) for Abdala. Mambisa showed similar results. Phase 2 responders were 88.6% for Abdala (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and 74.2% for Mambisa (<i>p</i> = 0.0412). In both phases, anti-RBD IgG titers, inhibition percentages and neutralizing antibody titers increased significantly after the booster dose. Both vaccines were safe and their immunogenicity surpassed the study endpoints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccines
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12091001
Citations
2
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and Immunogenicity of the Intranasal Vaccine Candidate Mambisa and the Intramuscular Vaccine Abdala Used as Booster Doses for COVID-19 Convalescents: A Randomized Phase 1–2 Clinical Trial

Marjoris Piñera-Martínez, Giselle Freyre-Corrales, Lismary Ávila-Díaz, Yisel Ávila-Albuerne et al.
2 citations
Vaccines
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
0.78
article

Safety and Immunogenicity of the Intranasal Vaccine Candidate Mambisa and the Intramuscular Vaccine Abdala Used as Booster Doses for COVID-19 Convalescents: A Randomized Phase 1–2 Clinical Trial

Marjoris Piñera-Martínez, Giselle Freyre-Corrales, Lismary Ávila-Díaz, Yisel Ávila-Albuerne, Amalia Vázquez-Arteaga, Eulogio Pimentel-Vázquez, Miladys Limonta‐Fernández, Gerardo Guillén, Hany González-Formental, Rolando Uranga-Piña, Marta Ayala‐Ávila, Sheila Chávez-Valdés, Ricardo Martínez-Rosales, Eduardo Martínez-Díaz, Gilda Lemos, Yinet Barrese-Pérez, Yahima Chacón-Quintero, Edelgis Coizeau-Rodríguez, Iglermis Figueroa-García, Osaida Calderín-Marín, Martha M. Gómez-Vázquez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A phase 1-2, prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial (Code RPCEC00000382), with parallel groups, involving 1161 participants, was designed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of two Cuban COVID-19 vaccines (Mambisa and Abdala) in boosting COVID-19 immunity of convalescent adults after receiving one dose of either vaccine. The main safety outcome was severe vaccination adverse events occurring in <5% of vaccinees. Main immunogenicity success endpoints were a ≥4-fold anti-RBD IgG seroconversion or a ≥20% increase in ACE2-RBD inhibitory antibodies in >55% of vaccinees in Phase 1 and >70% in Phase 2. Neutralizing antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 variants were evaluated. Both vaccines were safe-no deaths or severe adverse events occurred. Mild intensity adverse events were the most frequent (>73%); headaches predominated for both vaccines. Phase 1 responders were 83.3% (<i>p</i> = 0.0018) for Abdala. Mambisa showed similar results. Phase 2 responders were 88.6% for Abdala (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and 74.2% for Mambisa (<i>p</i> = 0.0412). In both phases, anti-RBD IgG titers, inhibition percentages and neutralizing antibody titers increased significantly after the booster dose. Both vaccines were safe and their immunogenicity surpassed the study endpoints.

VaccinesVol. 12(9)
University of Pinar del Río (CU), Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital (CU), Latin American School of Medicine (CU), Hospital Oncológico Docente "Conrado Benítez García" (CU), Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología y Medio Ambiente (CU), Centro de Ingeniería Genética y Biotecnología (CU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.