Power Over Presence: Women’s Representation in Comprehensive Peace Negotiations and Gender Provision Outcomes

The Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) sector assumes increasing the number of women involved in peace negotiations drives better outcomes for local women. However, empirical support for this assumption is inconsistent. This article tests how power alters the relationship between women’s formal (Track 1) involvement in peace negotiations and the inclusion of women-specific provisions in peace agreements. Using an original dataset comprised of 2,299 Track 1 delegates involved in 116 comprehensive peace agreements finalized between 1990 and 2021, I find women’s involvement in peace negotiations is positively correlated to comprehensive agreements containing provisions for women. However, this correlation is dependent on women holding positions of power—simply having women in the room is insufficient. This article offers a novel quantitative approach to WPS studies, provides nuance to theories linking descriptive and substantive representation, and casts doubt on the longstanding assumption that increasing women’s involvement inherently enhances gender equality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Political Science Review
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305542400073x
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power Over Presence: Women’s Representation in Comprehensive Peace Negotiations and Gender Provision Outcomes

E. B. Good
7 citations
American Political Science Review
Gender Politics and Representation
6.51
article

Power Over Presence: Women’s Representation in Comprehensive Peace Negotiations and Gender Provision Outcomes

E. B. Good
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) sector assumes increasing the number of women involved in peace negotiations drives better outcomes for local women. However, empirical support for this assumption is inconsistent. This article tests how power alters the relationship between women’s formal (Track 1) involvement in peace negotiations and the inclusion of women-specific provisions in peace agreements. Using an original dataset comprised of 2,299 Track 1 delegates involved in 116 comprehensive peace agreements finalized between 1990 and 2021, I find women’s involvement in peace negotiations is positively correlated to comprehensive agreements containing provisions for women. However, this correlation is dependent on women holding positions of power—simply having women in the room is insufficient. This article offers a novel quantitative approach to WPS studies, provides nuance to theories linking descriptive and substantive representation, and casts doubt on the longstanding assumption that increasing women’s involvement inherently enhances gender equality.

American Political Science ReviewVol. 119(3)
Northwestern University (US)
Northwestern University, Harvard University, Wildlife Preservation Society of Australia, Harvard Kennedy School
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Gender Politics and Representation
6.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.