406. EXPLORING THE OPTIMAL TIMING OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has gradually become a first-line treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. After the completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, patients usually undergo minimally invasive surgery to ensure complete removal of the tumor and lymphatic tissue. However, the optimal interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery is still an unknown factor, and whether it affects postoperative disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients remains unknown. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to explore the specific impact of the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery on patients, and to find the optimal interval time. Methods Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery from two institutions between October 2012 and September 2022 were included in this study. The time interval is defined as the days between the last time a patient receives neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and the execution of surgery. Determine the optimal interval truncation point using the surv_cutpoint function in the survminer package. The main research result is the OS and DFS of different interval groups. A multivariate Cox regression model was established to determine the main factors affecting Patient's OS. Construct a nomogram based on selected factors to meet clinical needs. Results 252 patients were included in the study. The average interval between patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery is 59 days. The earliest interval for patients to undergo surgery is 28 days. Determine the optimal interval of 46 days based on the survminer package and divide the patients into two groups. The five-year OS rates for the short interval group and the long interval group were 82.6% and 61.0% (P = 0.023). The five-year DFS rates for the two groups were 67.6% and 48.2% (P=0.068). Multivariate Cox regression shows that the time interval, patient's sex, tumor differentiation, ypT, and ypN are the main factors affecting overall survival. Conclusions The interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery has a certain impact on patient survival, and it is recommended to undergo surgery between 28 and 46 days to improve patient prognosis and survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Esophagus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.161
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

406. EXPLORING THE OPTIMAL TIMING OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY

Han Tang, Fangyi Liu, Wenyi Xu, Lijie Tan
Diseases of the Esophagus
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

406. EXPLORING THE OPTIMAL TIMING OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY

Han Tang, Fangyi Liu, Wenyi Xu, Lijie Tan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has gradually become a first-line treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. After the completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, patients usually undergo minimally invasive surgery to ensure complete removal of the tumor and lymphatic tissue. However, the optimal interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery is still an unknown factor, and whether it affects postoperative disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients remains unknown. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to explore the specific impact of the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery on patients, and to find the optimal interval time. Methods Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery from two institutions between October 2012 and September 2022 were included in this study. The time interval is defined as the days between the last time a patient receives neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and the execution of surgery. Determine the optimal interval truncation point using the surv_cutpoint function in the survminer package. The main research result is the OS and DFS of different interval groups. A multivariate Cox regression model was established to determine the main factors affecting Patient's OS. Construct a nomogram based on selected factors to meet clinical needs. Results 252 patients were included in the study. The average interval between patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery is 59 days. The earliest interval for patients to undergo surgery is 28 days. Determine the optimal interval of 46 days based on the survminer package and divide the patients into two groups. The five-year OS rates for the short interval group and the long interval group were 82.6% and 61.0% (P = 0.023). The five-year DFS rates for the two groups were 67.6% and 48.2% (P=0.068). Multivariate Cox regression shows that the time interval, patient's sex, tumor differentiation, ypT, and ypN are the main factors affecting overall survival. Conclusions The interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and minimally invasive surgery has a certain impact on patient survival, and it is recommended to undergo surgery between 28 and 46 days to improve patient prognosis and survival.

Diseases of the EsophagusVol. 37(Supplement_1)
Fudan University (CN), Zhongshan Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.