The world's largest hummingbird was described 131 years ago

A recent paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA argued that Giant Hummingbird Patagona gigas comprises two species (‘northern’ and ‘southern’) that differ in morphology, migratory behaviour and, especially, genetics. This proposal merits close consideration, but the introduction of a new name, ‘P. chaski’, for the northern population is unwarranted, as the taxon concerned had already been described, as Patagona peruviana Boucard, 1893. Failure by the authors of ‘P. chaski’ to identify and check the syntypes of P. peruviana, which unambiguously correspond to the same morphotype and taxon as ‘P. chaski’, resulted in the unnecessary erection of a ‘new species’ described already more than a century ago. Here we stabilise nomenclature by designating a lectotype for P. peruviana of which ‘P. chaski’ is a junior synonym.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the British Ornithologists Club
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v144i3.2024.a14
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Animal and Plant Science Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The world's largest hummingbird was described 131 years ago

Juan Ignacio Areta, Heraldo V. Norambuena, Guy M. Kirwan, Vítor de Queiroz Piacentini et al.
5 citations
Bulletin of the British Ornithologists Club
Animal and Plant Science Education
3.22
article

The world's largest hummingbird was described 131 years ago

Juan Ignacio Areta, Heraldo V. Norambuena, Guy M. Kirwan, Vítor de Queiroz Piacentini, Niels Krabbe, Matthew R. Halley
article en
5 citations

Abstract

A recent paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA argued that Giant Hummingbird Patagona gigas comprises two species (‘northern’ and ‘southern’) that differ in morphology, migratory behaviour and, especially, genetics. This proposal merits close consideration, but the introduction of a new name, ‘P. chaski’, for the northern population is unwarranted, as the taxon concerned had already been described, as Patagona peruviana Boucard, 1893. Failure by the authors of ‘P. chaski’ to identify and check the syntypes of P. peruviana, which unambiguously correspond to the same morphotype and taxon as ‘P. chaski’, resulted in the unnecessary erection of a ‘new species’ described already more than a century ago. Here we stabilise nomenclature by designating a lectotype for P. peruviana of which ‘P. chaski’ is a junior synonym.

Bulletin of the British Ornithologists ClubVol. 144(3)
Natural History Museum (GB), Field Museum of Natural History (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Animal and Plant Science Education
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.