560. ANALYSIS OF CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND PROGNOSIS OF SYNCHRONOUS MULTIPLE PRIMARY ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMAS (SMP-ESCC) AFTER RECEIVING NEOADJUVANT THERAPY

Abstract Background SMP-ESCC is a rare subtype of esophageal cancer. Esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy became the standard treatment. However, there are still no studies comparing SMP-ESCC and single lesion esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (SL-ESCC) after neoadjuvant therapy. Our study aimed to analyze the differences of clinicopathological features and prognosis between SMP-ESCC and SL-ESCC. Methods All patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (Platinum-based chemotherapy regimen with or without radiotherapy at a total dose of 41.4-50.4 Gy/23-28 times) and plan esophagectomy were consecutively collected from January 2019 to March 2023. SMP-ESCC was defined as multiple lesions in the esophagus found at the time of diagnosis by endoscopy, with lesions more than 1 cm apart by normal mucosa, and diagnosed by pathology as squamous carcinoma or Tis. The cohort was divided into two groups (SMP-ESCC vs. SL-ESCC) with a 1:1 ratio through propensity score matching, and the differences in clinicopathological features and prognosis were compared. Results A total of 926 patients were enrolled, 58 (6.4%) patients had the type of SMP-ESCC. SMP-ESCC had higher pN stages (p<0.001), and a lower rate of pathological complete response (13.8% vs. 29.4%, p=0.016). SMP-ESCC had a poorer OS (49.8% vs. 65.0%, p=0.020) and DFS (21.1% vs. 61.0%, p<0.001) (Figure A-B). After matching, SMP-ESCC had a poorer 3-year DFS (33.5% vs. 60.9%, p=0.020) and a trend of poorer OS (51.0% vs. 71.7%, p=0.086) (Figure 1 C-D). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that SMP-ESCC was an independent risk factor for OS (HR: 2.258, 95%CI: 1.006-5.068, p=0.048) and DFS (HR: 2.175, 95%CI: 1.157-4.092, p=0.016). Conclusion SMP-ESCC had a poorer response to neoadjuvant therapy compared to patients with SL-ESCC. And SMP-ESCC was an independent risk factor for OS and DFS, leading to a poorer prognosis. Therefore, SMP-ESCC need more rational and effective treatment in the perioperative period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Esophagus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.285
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

560. ANALYSIS OF CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND PROGNOSIS OF SYNCHRONOUS MULTIPLE PRIMARY ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMAS (SMP-ESCC) AFTER RECEIVING NEOADJUVANT THERAPY

Chao Jiang, Boyao Yu, Zhigang Li, Zhichao Liu et al.
Diseases of the Esophagus
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

560. ANALYSIS OF CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND PROGNOSIS OF SYNCHRONOUS MULTIPLE PRIMARY ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMAS (SMP-ESCC) AFTER RECEIVING NEOADJUVANT THERAPY

Chao Jiang, Boyao Yu, Zhigang Li, Zhichao Liu, Cong Qi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background SMP-ESCC is a rare subtype of esophageal cancer. Esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy became the standard treatment. However, there are still no studies comparing SMP-ESCC and single lesion esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (SL-ESCC) after neoadjuvant therapy. Our study aimed to analyze the differences of clinicopathological features and prognosis between SMP-ESCC and SL-ESCC. Methods All patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (Platinum-based chemotherapy regimen with or without radiotherapy at a total dose of 41.4-50.4 Gy/23-28 times) and plan esophagectomy were consecutively collected from January 2019 to March 2023. SMP-ESCC was defined as multiple lesions in the esophagus found at the time of diagnosis by endoscopy, with lesions more than 1 cm apart by normal mucosa, and diagnosed by pathology as squamous carcinoma or Tis. The cohort was divided into two groups (SMP-ESCC vs. SL-ESCC) with a 1:1 ratio through propensity score matching, and the differences in clinicopathological features and prognosis were compared. Results A total of 926 patients were enrolled, 58 (6.4%) patients had the type of SMP-ESCC. SMP-ESCC had higher pN stages (p<0.001), and a lower rate of pathological complete response (13.8% vs. 29.4%, p=0.016). SMP-ESCC had a poorer OS (49.8% vs. 65.0%, p=0.020) and DFS (21.1% vs. 61.0%, p<0.001) (Figure A-B). After matching, SMP-ESCC had a poorer 3-year DFS (33.5% vs. 60.9%, p=0.020) and a trend of poorer OS (51.0% vs. 71.7%, p=0.086) (Figure 1 C-D). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that SMP-ESCC was an independent risk factor for OS (HR: 2.258, 95%CI: 1.006-5.068, p=0.048) and DFS (HR: 2.175, 95%CI: 1.157-4.092, p=0.016). Conclusion SMP-ESCC had a poorer response to neoadjuvant therapy compared to patients with SL-ESCC. And SMP-ESCC was an independent risk factor for OS and DFS, leading to a poorer prognosis. Therefore, SMP-ESCC need more rational and effective treatment in the perioperative period.

Diseases of the EsophagusVol. 37(Supplement_1)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Shanghai Chest Hospital (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.