637. UPFRONT SURGERY IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: ACCURACY OF PREOPERATIVE CLINICAL STAGING

Abstract Background Treatment of locally limited esophageal cancer is still a frequently discussed topic. Especially, the inaccuracy of clinical staging in lymph node-negative T2-carcinomas has to be considered further in the treatment pathway. Aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of clinical staging in patients treated with esophagectomy without neoadjuvant treatment. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis at the departments of surgery from two university clinics. All patients between January 2016 and December 2023, who underwent an esophagectomy because of an esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma without neoadjuvant treatment were included. Advanced tumor stage, T staging greater than T2, was defined as exclusion criteria. Results Fifty-three patients after upfront esophagectomy were included in the analysis. In 40 (75%) patients a gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma was diagnosed, and 13 (25%) patients were treated because of a squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Clinical T staging was T1 or T2 and all lymph node stages were included. The endosonographic preoperative staging of invasion depth was accurate in 32 (60%) patients in comparison to the histopathological staging. In 7 (13%) cases the T-values were upstaged one level and in 5 (9%) cases one level downstaged after resection. The endosonographic preoperative staging of nodal spread was accurate in 32 (60%) patients. Furthermore, in 7 (13%) cases node status was upstaged and in 5 (9%) patients downstaged. Nine (17%) patients did not undergo a sufficient endosonographic staging, mainly due to prior endoscopic submucosal dissection or stenosis. In these patients, clinical lymph node staging was accurate in 4 patients. Conclusion Preoperative staging using endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography is not accurate enough in a high number of patients, therefore we are seeking to identify other predictive factors underlying advanced stage esophageal cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Esophagus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.341
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

637. UPFRONT SURGERY IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: ACCURACY OF PREOPERATIVE CLINICAL STAGING

Eva Wallner, Markus K. Diener, Christina Erhardt-Kreutzer, Michael Weitzendorfer et al.
Diseases of the Esophagus
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

637. UPFRONT SURGERY IN ESOPHAGEAL CANCER: ACCURACY OF PREOPERATIVE CLINICAL STAGING

Eva Wallner, Markus K. Diener, Christina Erhardt-Kreutzer, Michael Weitzendorfer, Luca Giulini, Irina Avramovska, Oliver O. Koch, Björn Rudisch, Filitsa Farmaki, Melissa Kemeter, Klaus Emmanuel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Treatment of locally limited esophageal cancer is still a frequently discussed topic. Especially, the inaccuracy of clinical staging in lymph node-negative T2-carcinomas has to be considered further in the treatment pathway. Aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of clinical staging in patients treated with esophagectomy without neoadjuvant treatment. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis at the departments of surgery from two university clinics. All patients between January 2016 and December 2023, who underwent an esophagectomy because of an esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma without neoadjuvant treatment were included. Advanced tumor stage, T staging greater than T2, was defined as exclusion criteria. Results Fifty-three patients after upfront esophagectomy were included in the analysis. In 40 (75%) patients a gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma was diagnosed, and 13 (25%) patients were treated because of a squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Clinical T staging was T1 or T2 and all lymph node stages were included. The endosonographic preoperative staging of invasion depth was accurate in 32 (60%) patients in comparison to the histopathological staging. In 7 (13%) cases the T-values were upstaged one level and in 5 (9%) cases one level downstaged after resection. The endosonographic preoperative staging of nodal spread was accurate in 32 (60%) patients. Furthermore, in 7 (13%) cases node status was upstaged and in 5 (9%) patients downstaged. Nine (17%) patients did not undergo a sufficient endosonographic staging, mainly due to prior endoscopic submucosal dissection or stenosis. In these patients, clinical lymph node staging was accurate in 4 patients. Conclusion Preoperative staging using endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography is not accurate enough in a high number of patients, therefore we are seeking to identify other predictive factors underlying advanced stage esophageal cancer.

Diseases of the EsophagusVol. 37(Supplement_1)
Paracelsus Medical University (AT), Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.