542. POST-ESOPHAGECTOMY PARACONDUIT HIATAL HERNIA DEVELOPMENT AND RECURRENCE

Abstract Background Hiatal hernia post esophagectomy is a delayed postoperative complication. Historically, in open surgery, the incidence is rare. The increased utilization of minimally invasive methods has increased the incidence of hiatal hernias. Current literature is limited to case series. There is even less on frequency and management of re-recurrent cases. Our objectives were to identify the incidence of hiatal hernia post esophagectomy and the outcomes of the recurrent cases. Methods A retrospective analysis of prospective data at a single center was conducted on esophagectomies performed 2017 to 2022. Non-gastric conduit reconstructions were excluded. Baseline patient demographics including comorbidities, type of tumor, neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach (open versus minimally invasive [MIE]), and conduit construction were recorded. Radiographic presence of non-gastric conduit abdominal contents was defined as hiatal hernia. Time of hiatal hernia occurrence, details of the repair and timing re-recurrence was recorded. Associated factors described in literature including baseline demographics, neoadjuvant therapy, operative technique, conduit diameter and use of pexy techniques were analyzed with univariate analysis. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results A total of 565 esophagectomies met inclusion criteria, 78% (439/565) were MIE. Robotic-assisted comprised 33% (143/439) of the MIE cohort. A hiatal hernia was identified in 3% of patients (15/565). All had malignancy and were Ivor Lewis (11/15, 73%) or 3-hole (4/15, 27%). The majority had an MIE (13/15, 86%), one had open esophagectomy (6%), and one had hybrid (1/15, 6%). There was no difference in risk factors between the hernia and non-hernia groups. Median time to hernia was 5 months (IQR: 4, 12). All underwent repair. Recurrent hernia occurred in 33% of patients (5/15), all within the robotic-assisted MIE. Conclusion Hiatal hernia post esophagectomy occurred in 3% of cases, and most cases occurred within the MIE group. Recurrence of hernias occurred in robotic-assisted esophagectomy patients. Analysis of patient-specific factors such as prior hiatal hernia, body-mass index, neoadjuvant therapy, operative technique, conduit pexy technique all did not reveal significant correlation with hiatal hernia development. The recurrence of hiatal hernia all required redo repairs. Though we had no deaths in the hiatal hernia cohort, repeat surgeries affect morbidity in esophagectomy patients. Further analysis is needed to identify ways to minimize hernia recurrence in minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Esophagus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.272
Primary Topic
Esophageal and GI Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

542. POST-ESOPHAGECTOMY PARACONDUIT HIATAL HERNIA DEVELOPMENT AND RECURRENCE

Matthew M. Rochefort, Ealaf Shemmeri, Michael T. Jaklitsch, Fatemehsadat Pezeshkian et al.
Diseases of the Esophagus
Esophageal and GI Pathology
article

542. POST-ESOPHAGECTOMY PARACONDUIT HIATAL HERNIA DEVELOPMENT AND RECURRENCE

Matthew M. Rochefort, Ealaf Shemmeri, Michael T. Jaklitsch, Fatemehsadat Pezeshkian, Miles McAllister, Jon O. Wee, Anupama Singh, Scott J. Swanson, Raphael Bueno, Daniel Wiener
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Hiatal hernia post esophagectomy is a delayed postoperative complication. Historically, in open surgery, the incidence is rare. The increased utilization of minimally invasive methods has increased the incidence of hiatal hernias. Current literature is limited to case series. There is even less on frequency and management of re-recurrent cases. Our objectives were to identify the incidence of hiatal hernia post esophagectomy and the outcomes of the recurrent cases. Methods A retrospective analysis of prospective data at a single center was conducted on esophagectomies performed 2017 to 2022. Non-gastric conduit reconstructions were excluded. Baseline patient demographics including comorbidities, type of tumor, neoadjuvant therapy, surgical approach (open versus minimally invasive [MIE]), and conduit construction were recorded. Radiographic presence of non-gastric conduit abdominal contents was defined as hiatal hernia. Time of hiatal hernia occurrence, details of the repair and timing re-recurrence was recorded. Associated factors described in literature including baseline demographics, neoadjuvant therapy, operative technique, conduit diameter and use of pexy techniques were analyzed with univariate analysis. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results A total of 565 esophagectomies met inclusion criteria, 78% (439/565) were MIE. Robotic-assisted comprised 33% (143/439) of the MIE cohort. A hiatal hernia was identified in 3% of patients (15/565). All had malignancy and were Ivor Lewis (11/15, 73%) or 3-hole (4/15, 27%). The majority had an MIE (13/15, 86%), one had open esophagectomy (6%), and one had hybrid (1/15, 6%). There was no difference in risk factors between the hernia and non-hernia groups. Median time to hernia was 5 months (IQR: 4, 12). All underwent repair. Recurrent hernia occurred in 33% of patients (5/15), all within the robotic-assisted MIE. Conclusion Hiatal hernia post esophagectomy occurred in 3% of cases, and most cases occurred within the MIE group. Recurrence of hernias occurred in robotic-assisted esophagectomy patients. Analysis of patient-specific factors such as prior hiatal hernia, body-mass index, neoadjuvant therapy, operative technique, conduit pexy technique all did not reveal significant correlation with hiatal hernia development. The recurrence of hiatal hernia all required redo repairs. Though we had no deaths in the hiatal hernia cohort, repeat surgeries affect morbidity in esophagectomy patients. Further analysis is needed to identify ways to minimize hernia recurrence in minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Diseases of the EsophagusVol. 37(Supplement_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Esophageal and GI Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.