495. LAPAROSCOPIC FUNDOPLICATION IMPROVES ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IN PATIENTS WITH GERD A HIGH VOLUME SINGLE CENTER CONTROLLED STUDY IN HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY ERA

Abstract Background Pathophysiology of GERD is complex and esophageal motility disorders are frequently contributing to the disease. Most of the existing literature demonstrates that Laparoscopic Fundoplication (LF) is safe in the setting of ineffective or weak peristalsis, however the effect of the wrap on esophageal motility is still debated. This study aimed to assess how a functioning and effective fundoplication could impact the esophageal motility in patients with GERD. Methods We analyzed prospectively collected data on patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen (LN) or Toupet (LT) fundoplication for GERD between 2010-2022. We selected patients who have been treated with LF according to the GERD international guidelines. The exclusion criteria were: patients with a giant hiatal hernia and patients with a proof of a too-tight LF. Patients were evaluated with the GerdQ questionnaire, barium-swallow, endoscopy and HRM and 24-hour pH-Impedance before and after surgery. The HRM were reviewed by 2 experts (Chicago Classification v4.0). LF failure was recorded in case of an abnormal postoperative pH-MII using the Lyon 2.0 criteria. Results We recruited 124 patients (M:F=89:35). Fifty-eight LN and 66 LT were recorded. A good outcome at the 24-hour pH-Impedance was registered in 103 patients (GLF) and a failure in 21 patients (FLF). As shown in Figure 1, in GLF patients, 29 had a preoperative motility disorder (24 IEM and 5 DES), and postoperatively 22 (76%) of these patients had a normalization of the esophageal motility. Ten FLF patients had a preoperative motility disorder (9 IEM and one DES); 4 (40%) of them showed normal motility after LF. There was a significant association between GLF and normalization of esophageal motility (p<0.05). Conclusion This study demonstrates that LF is an effective and functioning treatment in patients with GERD associated with an esophageal motility disorder. Moreover, our results indicate that LF could determine a normalization of the disordered esophageal motor function in patients with GERD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Esophagus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.232
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

495. LAPAROSCOPIC FUNDOPLICATION IMPROVES ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IN PATIENTS WITH GERD A HIGH VOLUME SINGLE CENTER CONTROLLED STUDY IN HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY ERA

Matteo Pittacolo, Renato Salvador, Loredana Nicoletti, Lucia Moletta et al.
Diseases of the Esophagus
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

495. LAPAROSCOPIC FUNDOPLICATION IMPROVES ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IN PATIENTS WITH GERD A HIGH VOLUME SINGLE CENTER CONTROLLED STUDY IN HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY ERA

Matteo Pittacolo, Renato Salvador, Loredana Nicoletti, Lucia Moletta, Giovanni Capovilla, Matteo Santangelo, Arianna Vittori, Michele Valmasoni, Francesca Forattini, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino, Andrea Costantini, Luca Provenzano
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Pathophysiology of GERD is complex and esophageal motility disorders are frequently contributing to the disease. Most of the existing literature demonstrates that Laparoscopic Fundoplication (LF) is safe in the setting of ineffective or weak peristalsis, however the effect of the wrap on esophageal motility is still debated. This study aimed to assess how a functioning and effective fundoplication could impact the esophageal motility in patients with GERD. Methods We analyzed prospectively collected data on patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen (LN) or Toupet (LT) fundoplication for GERD between 2010-2022. We selected patients who have been treated with LF according to the GERD international guidelines. The exclusion criteria were: patients with a giant hiatal hernia and patients with a proof of a too-tight LF. Patients were evaluated with the GerdQ questionnaire, barium-swallow, endoscopy and HRM and 24-hour pH-Impedance before and after surgery. The HRM were reviewed by 2 experts (Chicago Classification v4.0). LF failure was recorded in case of an abnormal postoperative pH-MII using the Lyon 2.0 criteria. Results We recruited 124 patients (M:F=89:35). Fifty-eight LN and 66 LT were recorded. A good outcome at the 24-hour pH-Impedance was registered in 103 patients (GLF) and a failure in 21 patients (FLF). As shown in Figure 1, in GLF patients, 29 had a preoperative motility disorder (24 IEM and 5 DES), and postoperatively 22 (76%) of these patients had a normalization of the esophageal motility. Ten FLF patients had a preoperative motility disorder (9 IEM and one DES); 4 (40%) of them showed normal motility after LF. There was a significant association between GLF and normalization of esophageal motility (p<0.05). Conclusion This study demonstrates that LF is an effective and functioning treatment in patients with GERD associated with an esophageal motility disorder. Moreover, our results indicate that LF could determine a normalization of the disordered esophageal motor function in patients with GERD.

Diseases of the EsophagusVol. 37(Supplement_1)
University of Padua (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.