The Linguistic Provenance of the Hebrew King Arthur (1279) Reassessed

Abstract Based on its inclusion of non-Hebrew Italian loanwords and the sole surviving manuscript copy being Italian, the current consensus among scholars is that an Italian Jew authored Melekh Artus (1279), the only extant medieval Hebrew translation of Arthurian material. The following study destabilizes this consensus opinion demonstrating why these loanwords are a precarious tool when ascertaining this text’s linguistic provenance. Not only are most of the said loanwords not necessarily Italian, but, using Italian copies of the French biblical commentator Rashi, this study establishes that Jewish Italian scribes sometimes Italianized Old French loanwords they encountered in their Hebrew sources. Thus, the few loanwords that are Italianisms do not prove Italian authorship but merely that the sole surviving copy was produced by an Italian-Jewish scribe adhering to the scribal conventions of his times.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ARTHURIAN SOCIETY
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/jias-2024-0003
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Linguistic Provenance of the Hebrew King Arthur (1279) Reassessed

Leon Jacobowitz-Efron
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ARTHURIAN SOCIETY
Historical and Linguistic Studies
article

The Linguistic Provenance of the Hebrew King Arthur (1279) Reassessed

Leon Jacobowitz-Efron
article en

Abstract

Abstract Based on its inclusion of non-Hebrew Italian loanwords and the sole surviving manuscript copy being Italian, the current consensus among scholars is that an Italian Jew authored Melekh Artus (1279), the only extant medieval Hebrew translation of Arthurian material. The following study destabilizes this consensus opinion demonstrating why these loanwords are a precarious tool when ascertaining this text’s linguistic provenance. Not only are most of the said loanwords not necessarily Italian, but, using Italian copies of the French biblical commentator Rashi, this study establishes that Jewish Italian scribes sometimes Italianized Old French loanwords they encountered in their Hebrew sources. Thus, the few loanwords that are Italianisms do not prove Italian authorship but merely that the sole surviving copy was produced by an Italian-Jewish scribe adhering to the scribal conventions of his times.

JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ARTHURIAN SOCIETYVol. 12(1)
Shalem College (IL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.