586. VALUE OF PEPSIN IN SALIVA TO ASSESS THE POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH GERD

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of salivary pepsin to assess the outcome of surgical treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). Methods Forty-five consecutive patients with GERD despite proton pump inhibitor treatment received laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS). 24-hour esophageal pH-monitoring (MII-pH) and esophageal manometry (HRM) data were documented preoperatively and at 3-month follow-up. Clinical symptoms were rated with the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) and gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated by a standardized symptom checklist (SCL), assessing the severity and intensitiy of 14 different symptoms. Simultaneous to MII-pH the collection of 3 saliva samples per patient was performed. Treatment failure was defined as improvement of GIQLI and SCL of < 10 points, despite showing a normal DeMeester score. Results At baseline, all patients showed a pathological MII-pH measurement. Furthermore, all patients showed postoperatively a normal DeMeester score (mean 7.10 ± 4.56). Ten patients were defined as treatment failures with a change of pepsin concentration from a mean value of 198.73 ng/mL to 186.00 ng/mL (p>0.05). In patients defined as treatment success, mean pepsin value decreased from 205.83 ng/mL to 85.24 ng/mL (p<0.001). Conclusion Salivary pepsin could be a marker for treatment success after LARS. However, larger studies are required to reach firm conclusions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Esophagus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.306
Primary Topic
Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

586. VALUE OF PEPSIN IN SALIVA TO ASSESS THE POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH GERD

Charlotte Rabl, Michael Weitzendorfer, Oliver O. Koch, E. Wallner et al.
Diseases of the Esophagus
Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
article

586. VALUE OF PEPSIN IN SALIVA TO ASSESS THE POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH GERD

Charlotte Rabl, Michael Weitzendorfer, Oliver O. Koch, E. Wallner, Klaus Emmanuel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of salivary pepsin to assess the outcome of surgical treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). Methods Forty-five consecutive patients with GERD despite proton pump inhibitor treatment received laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (LARS). 24-hour esophageal pH-monitoring (MII-pH) and esophageal manometry (HRM) data were documented preoperatively and at 3-month follow-up. Clinical symptoms were rated with the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) and gastrointestinal symptoms were evaluated by a standardized symptom checklist (SCL), assessing the severity and intensitiy of 14 different symptoms. Simultaneous to MII-pH the collection of 3 saliva samples per patient was performed. Treatment failure was defined as improvement of GIQLI and SCL of < 10 points, despite showing a normal DeMeester score. Results At baseline, all patients showed a pathological MII-pH measurement. Furthermore, all patients showed postoperatively a normal DeMeester score (mean 7.10 ± 4.56). Ten patients were defined as treatment failures with a change of pepsin concentration from a mean value of 198.73 ng/mL to 186.00 ng/mL (p>0.05). In patients defined as treatment success, mean pepsin value decreased from 205.83 ng/mL to 85.24 ng/mL (p<0.001). Conclusion Salivary pepsin could be a marker for treatment success after LARS. However, larger studies are required to reach firm conclusions.

Diseases of the EsophagusVol. 37(Supplement_1)
Paracelsus Medical University (AT)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.