538. COMPARISON OF EARLY POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF CERVICAL ANASTOMOSIS TO HIGH INTRATHORACIC ANASTOMOSIS AMONG PATIENTS WITH UPPER THORACIC ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

Abstract Background For upper thoracic esophageal cancer, esophagectomy combined with cervical esophagogastrostomy (cervical anastomosis, CA) and three-field lymph node dissection (3FLND) has been proposed as the standard surgical approach. However, while CA provides sufficient length of proximal resection margins, it is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications such as anastomotic leaks, recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury, and increased mortality. As an alternative, high-intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis (high-ITA) with 3FLND has been performed. We aimed to evaluate the benefits and limitations of high-ITA compared to conventional CA in terms of early postoperative outcomes. Methods A total of 232 patients, who underwent curative esophagogastrostomy with 3FLND and either of high-intrathoracic anastomosis (high-ITA) or cervical anastomosis (CA) for upper thoracic esophageal cancer a tertiary hospital from January 2010 to December 2021. Collected data from medical records were analyzed retrospectively regarding morbidity and mortality rates. The primary end point was recurrence. Anastomotic leak, RLN palsy, hospital stay, and 90-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were evaluated using Chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, and T-test. The risk of mortality and recurrence were analyzed using Cox-proportional hazard regression with a median follow-up of 39.1(IQR 17.8, 80.2) months. Results Among the fifty patients with high-ITA and 182 patients with CA, the high-ITA group reported fewer anastomotic leaks (6.0% vs. 19.8%, p=0.02) and a shorter hospital stay (median 12days vs. 15 days, p<0.001). No significant difference was observed in RLN palsy (6.0% vs. 13.7%, p=0.22) and the 90-day or in-hospital mortality rate (2.0% vs. 2.2%, p=1.0). The number of lymph nodes dissected (LND) was similar between the groups (47.4(±15.4) vs. 52.7(±18.3), p=0.06), and there was no difference in the risk of mortality and recurrence according to the high-ITA method (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6-1.6; HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.6-1.7) after adjustment for age, sex, and stage. Conclusion In the esophagogastrostomy with three-field lymph node dissection, performing high-intrathoracic anastomosis may reduce the incidence of anastomotic leaks and shorten the hospital stay without adversely affecting overall survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Esophagus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.268
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

538. COMPARISON OF EARLY POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF CERVICAL ANASTOMOSIS TO HIGH INTRATHORACIC ANASTOMOSIS AMONG PATIENTS WITH UPPER THORACIC ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

Yeong Jeong Jeon, Jong Ho Cho, Genehee Lee, Yong‐Soo Choi et al.
Diseases of the Esophagus
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

538. COMPARISON OF EARLY POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF CERVICAL ANASTOMOSIS TO HIGH INTRATHORACIC ANASTOMOSIS AMONG PATIENTS WITH UPPER THORACIC ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

Yeong Jeong Jeon, Jong Ho Cho, Genehee Lee, Yong‐Soo Choi, Young Mog Shim, Hong Kwan Kim, Jingook Kim, Seong-Yong Park, Jung­hee Lee, Jeonga Son
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background For upper thoracic esophageal cancer, esophagectomy combined with cervical esophagogastrostomy (cervical anastomosis, CA) and three-field lymph node dissection (3FLND) has been proposed as the standard surgical approach. However, while CA provides sufficient length of proximal resection margins, it is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications such as anastomotic leaks, recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury, and increased mortality. As an alternative, high-intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis (high-ITA) with 3FLND has been performed. We aimed to evaluate the benefits and limitations of high-ITA compared to conventional CA in terms of early postoperative outcomes. Methods A total of 232 patients, who underwent curative esophagogastrostomy with 3FLND and either of high-intrathoracic anastomosis (high-ITA) or cervical anastomosis (CA) for upper thoracic esophageal cancer a tertiary hospital from January 2010 to December 2021. Collected data from medical records were analyzed retrospectively regarding morbidity and mortality rates. The primary end point was recurrence. Anastomotic leak, RLN palsy, hospital stay, and 90-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were evaluated using Chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, and T-test. The risk of mortality and recurrence were analyzed using Cox-proportional hazard regression with a median follow-up of 39.1(IQR 17.8, 80.2) months. Results Among the fifty patients with high-ITA and 182 patients with CA, the high-ITA group reported fewer anastomotic leaks (6.0% vs. 19.8%, p=0.02) and a shorter hospital stay (median 12days vs. 15 days, p<0.001). No significant difference was observed in RLN palsy (6.0% vs. 13.7%, p=0.22) and the 90-day or in-hospital mortality rate (2.0% vs. 2.2%, p=1.0). The number of lymph nodes dissected (LND) was similar between the groups (47.4(±15.4) vs. 52.7(±18.3), p=0.06), and there was no difference in the risk of mortality and recurrence according to the high-ITA method (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6-1.6; HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.6-1.7) after adjustment for age, sex, and stage. Conclusion In the esophagogastrostomy with three-field lymph node dissection, performing high-intrathoracic anastomosis may reduce the incidence of anastomotic leaks and shorten the hospital stay without adversely affecting overall survival.

Diseases of the EsophagusVol. 37(Supplement_1)
Samsung (South Korea) (KR), Samsung Medical Center (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.