467. DISTRIBUTION OF LYMPH NODE INVOLVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION ADENOCARCINOMA

Abstract Background Curative cancer surgery relies on understanding the lymphatic spread of the tumour to guide lymphadenectomy. The lymphatic involvement in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has been evaluated extensively in large cohort studies from the East where SCC predominates, but the pattern of lymph node spread in gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is less clear. The primary aim of this study was to compare differences in the pattern of lymph node involvement according to the Siewert classification. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for GEJ adenocarcinoma between February 2010 and April 2023 were analysed from a prospectively maintained database. Patient demographic data, neo-adjuvant treatment, operation type and histopathological report data were collected and analysed according to the pathological Siewert classification of GEJ cancer. Results 807 patients who underwent curative surgery for GEJ adenocarcinoma were analysed. The median lymph node yield was 26 (5-81). Comparing positive para-esophageal node yields, Type I and II tumours were similar but both significantly higher than Type III. For positive para-gastric nodes, Type 2 and 3 tumours were similar but both significantly higher than type 1. The significance of these comparisons is presented in table 1. There were no differences comparing other specific nodal groups. Evaluating the effect of node involvement on overall survival positive node status and positive hepatic artery nodes were found to be independent factors adversely affecting survival. Conclusion Siewert type I tumours have greater proximal lymph node involvement compared to type III tumours with higher proportions of positive para-esophageal nodes. Type III tumours on the other hand have higher proportions of para-gastric nodes. Type II tumours have similar para-esophageal node involvement to type 1 tumours and similar para-gastric involvement to type III tumours. Involvement of more specific nodal groups does not seem to vary between the sub types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Esophagus
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae057.214
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

467. DISTRIBUTION OF LYMPH NODE INVOLVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION ADENOCARCINOMA

Ji Chung Tham, Lee Humphreys, Richard Berrisford, James Walmsley et al.
Diseases of the Esophagus
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

467. DISTRIBUTION OF LYMPH NODE INVOLVEMENT IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION ADENOCARCINOMA

Ji Chung Tham, Lee Humphreys, Richard Berrisford, James Walmsley, David SY Chan, Arun Ariyarathenam, Tim Wheatley, Grant Sanders
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Curative cancer surgery relies on understanding the lymphatic spread of the tumour to guide lymphadenectomy. The lymphatic involvement in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has been evaluated extensively in large cohort studies from the East where SCC predominates, but the pattern of lymph node spread in gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is less clear. The primary aim of this study was to compare differences in the pattern of lymph node involvement according to the Siewert classification. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for GEJ adenocarcinoma between February 2010 and April 2023 were analysed from a prospectively maintained database. Patient demographic data, neo-adjuvant treatment, operation type and histopathological report data were collected and analysed according to the pathological Siewert classification of GEJ cancer. Results 807 patients who underwent curative surgery for GEJ adenocarcinoma were analysed. The median lymph node yield was 26 (5-81). Comparing positive para-esophageal node yields, Type I and II tumours were similar but both significantly higher than Type III. For positive para-gastric nodes, Type 2 and 3 tumours were similar but both significantly higher than type 1. The significance of these comparisons is presented in table 1. There were no differences comparing other specific nodal groups. Evaluating the effect of node involvement on overall survival positive node status and positive hepatic artery nodes were found to be independent factors adversely affecting survival. Conclusion Siewert type I tumours have greater proximal lymph node involvement compared to type III tumours with higher proportions of positive para-esophageal nodes. Type III tumours on the other hand have higher proportions of para-gastric nodes. Type II tumours have similar para-esophageal node involvement to type 1 tumours and similar para-gastric involvement to type III tumours. Involvement of more specific nodal groups does not seem to vary between the sub types.

Diseases of the EsophagusVol. 37(Supplement_1)
University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.