The Clay Minerals in the Soils of the Gypseous Belt of Barbastro, NE Spain

This article examines the clay mineralogy of twelve representative soils developed from gypsum-rich parent materials on several geomorphic positions. These soils were classified as Haploxerept, plus one profile as Humixerept and another as Xerorthent. The clay mineralogy, determined by X-ray diffraction, showed quite a similar clay composition in all profiles, with mica, chlorite, and smectite, from most to less abundant. Mica and chlorite are deemed inherited, while smectite—appearing in minor proportions—could result from both transformation and/or neoformation, because the leaching of bases by free drainage does not favor the transformation of mica to smectite. Therefore, the differences in clay mineralogy appeared to be lithogenic rather than pedogenic. These compositional data are an advance in the basic knowledge of the studied soils.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2024-09-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091415
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Clay minerals and soil interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Clay Minerals in the Soils of the Gypseous Belt of Barbastro, NE Spain

J. Herrero, Carmen Castañeda, Raimundo Jiménez‐Ballesta
4 citations
Land
Clay minerals and soil interactions
0.69
article

The Clay Minerals in the Soils of the Gypseous Belt of Barbastro, NE Spain

J. Herrero, Carmen Castañeda, Raimundo Jiménez‐Ballesta
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This article examines the clay mineralogy of twelve representative soils developed from gypsum-rich parent materials on several geomorphic positions. These soils were classified as Haploxerept, plus one profile as Humixerept and another as Xerorthent. The clay mineralogy, determined by X-ray diffraction, showed quite a similar clay composition in all profiles, with mica, chlorite, and smectite, from most to less abundant. Mica and chlorite are deemed inherited, while smectite—appearing in minor proportions—could result from both transformation and/or neoformation, because the leaching of bases by free drainage does not favor the transformation of mica to smectite. Therefore, the differences in clay mineralogy appeared to be lithogenic rather than pedogenic. These compositional data are an advance in the basic knowledge of the studied soils.

LandVol. 13(9)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Estación Experimental de Aula Dei (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
European Commission, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Clay minerals and soil interactions
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Clay Minerals in the Soils of the Gypseous Belt of Barbastro, NE Spain — J. Herrero, Carmen Castañeda, et al. · Land (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS