Low-Cost CO2 NDIR Sensors: Performance Evaluation and Calibration Using Machine Learning Techniques

The study comprehensively evaluates low-cost CO<sub>2</sub> sensors from different price tiers, assessing their performance against a reference-grade instrument and exploring the possibility of calibration using different machine learning techniques. Three sensors (Sunrise AB by Senseair, K30 CO<sub>2</sub> by Senseair, and GMP 343 by Vaisala) were tested alongside a reference instrument (Los Gatos precision greenhouse gas analyzer). The results revealed differences in sensor performance, with the higher cost Vaisala sensors exhibiting superior accuracy. Despite its lower price, the Sunrise sensors still demonstrated reasonable accuracy. Meanwhile, the K30 sensor measurements displayed higher variability and noise. Machine learning models, including linear regression, gradient boosting regression, and random forest regression, were employed for sensor calibration. In general, linear regression models performed best for extrapolating data, whereas decision tree-based models were generally more useful in handling non-linear datasets. Notably, a stack ensemble model combining these techniques outperformed the individual models and significantly improved sensor accuracy by approximately 65%. Overall, this study contributes to filling the gap in intercomparing CO<sub>2</sub> sensors across different price categories and underscores the potential of machine learning for enhancing sensor accuracy, particularly in low-cost sensor applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s24175675
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-Cost CO2 NDIR Sensors: Performance Evaluation and Calibration Using Machine Learning Techniques

Chang Cao, Jonathan Gewirtzman, Xuhui Lee, J. A. Nikkel et al.
20 citations
Sensors
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
4.11
article

Low-Cost CO2 NDIR Sensors: Performance Evaluation and Calibration Using Machine Learning Techniques

Chang Cao, Jonathan Gewirtzman, Xuhui Lee, J. A. Nikkel, A. B. Telles, Peter A. Raymond, Ravish Dubey
article en
20 citations

Abstract

The study comprehensively evaluates low-cost CO<sub>2</sub> sensors from different price tiers, assessing their performance against a reference-grade instrument and exploring the possibility of calibration using different machine learning techniques. Three sensors (Sunrise AB by Senseair, K30 CO<sub>2</sub> by Senseair, and GMP 343 by Vaisala) were tested alongside a reference instrument (Los Gatos precision greenhouse gas analyzer). The results revealed differences in sensor performance, with the higher cost Vaisala sensors exhibiting superior accuracy. Despite its lower price, the Sunrise sensors still demonstrated reasonable accuracy. Meanwhile, the K30 sensor measurements displayed higher variability and noise. Machine learning models, including linear regression, gradient boosting regression, and random forest regression, were employed for sensor calibration. In general, linear regression models performed best for extrapolating data, whereas decision tree-based models were generally more useful in handling non-linear datasets. Notably, a stack ensemble model combining these techniques outperformed the individual models and significantly improved sensor accuracy by approximately 65%. Overall, this study contributes to filling the gap in intercomparing CO<sub>2</sub> sensors across different price categories and underscores the potential of machine learning for enhancing sensor accuracy, particularly in low-cost sensor applications.

SensorsVol. 24(17)
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN), Yale University (US)
Yale University, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
4.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.