Status of monitoring and evaluation of Tonga’s Special Management Area program

Tonga’s Special Management Areas (SMAs) have been widely supported by the people of Tonga as a successful approach to the comanagement of their fisheries and marine resources. However, due to the dominant focus on expansion of the program over recent years, challenges remain for the effective and consistent monitoring and evaluation needed to understand program impacts. This review compiles all known ecological, fisheries, and socio-economic monitoring and evaluation reports related to Tonga’s Special Management Areas from 2010 onwards. A total of 25 projects with available reports were identified, with most examining ecological (42%) and socio-economic (42%) aspects of SMAs, whereas reporting on SMA fisheries data (e.g. catch) was limited to five available projects. Most studies also represented ‘baseline’ ecological and socio-economic surveys of SMAs during implementation. Only three studies have assessed the ecological impact of SMAs post intervention, and only one of these incorporated ‘follow-up’ surveys at a second time point. Among these, impacts remain mixed, with some SMAs resulting in larger and more abundant fish, but others showing no impact. Other monitoring challenges include no gender disaggregation of data, no monitoring of gleaning, haphazard monitoring by communities, and general concerns of cost, fit for purpose, and overinvestment. Although the limited available ecological data indicates that SMAs can increase fish size and abundance in some cases, rationalised, more efficient, and targeted monitoring is required to better understand and strengthen the functioning of SMAs and inform community and government management decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacific Conservation Biology
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/pc24003
Primary Topic
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Status of monitoring and evaluation of Tonga’s Special Management Area program

Poasi Ngaluafe, Patrick Smallhorn‐West, Karen Stone, George Shedrawi et al.
Pacific Conservation Biology
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
article

Status of monitoring and evaluation of Tonga’s Special Management Area program

Poasi Ngaluafe, Patrick Smallhorn‐West, Karen Stone, George Shedrawi, Sophie E. Gordon, Siola’a Malimali, Nicholas Ford‐Learner, Katrina Ma’u Fatiaki, Vetekina Pau’u, Tonga Tuiano, Sioeli Afu, Latu S. Aisea, Viliami Fatongiatu, Lisiate Hanisi, Sela Kioa, Sesimani Lokotui
article en

Abstract

Tonga’s Special Management Areas (SMAs) have been widely supported by the people of Tonga as a successful approach to the comanagement of their fisheries and marine resources. However, due to the dominant focus on expansion of the program over recent years, challenges remain for the effective and consistent monitoring and evaluation needed to understand program impacts. This review compiles all known ecological, fisheries, and socio-economic monitoring and evaluation reports related to Tonga’s Special Management Areas from 2010 onwards. A total of 25 projects with available reports were identified, with most examining ecological (42%) and socio-economic (42%) aspects of SMAs, whereas reporting on SMA fisheries data (e.g. catch) was limited to five available projects. Most studies also represented ‘baseline’ ecological and socio-economic surveys of SMAs during implementation. Only three studies have assessed the ecological impact of SMAs post intervention, and only one of these incorporated ‘follow-up’ surveys at a second time point. Among these, impacts remain mixed, with some SMAs resulting in larger and more abundant fish, but others showing no impact. Other monitoring challenges include no gender disaggregation of data, no monitoring of gleaning, haphazard monitoring by communities, and general concerns of cost, fit for purpose, and overinvestment. Although the limited available ecological data indicates that SMAs can increase fish size and abundance in some cases, rationalised, more efficient, and targeted monitoring is required to better understand and strengthen the functioning of SMAs and inform community and government management decisions.

Pacific Conservation BiologyVol. 30(5)
Pacific Community (NC), Australian Institute of Marine Science (AU), Wildlife Conservation Society (US), University of Wollongong (AU), British Veterinary Association (GB), Atenisi Institute (TO), Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and Food (TO), Human Growth Foundation (US), WorldFish (MY), James Cook University (AU)
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.