Outcome-Orientated Organ Allocation—A Composite Risk Model for Pancreas Graft Evaluation and Acceptance

<b>Background</b>: Pancreas transplantation (PTX) remains the most effective treatment to prevent long-term complications and provide consistent euglycemia in patients with endocrine pancreatic insufficiency, mainly in type I diabetic patients. Considering early graft loss (EGL) and the perioperative complication rate, an optimal risk stratification based on donor risk factors is paramount. <b>Methods</b>: In our single-center study, we retrospectively assessed the risk factors for EGL and reduced graft survival in 97 PTXs (82 simultaneous pancreas and kidney [SPK], 11 pancreases transplanted after kidney [PAK] and 4 pancreases transplanted alone [PTA]) between 2010 and 2021. By statistically analyzing the incorporation of different donor risk factors using the Kaplan-Meier method and a log-rank test, we introduced a composite risk model for the evaluation of offered pancreas grafts. <b>Results</b>: The overall EGL rate was 6.5%. In the univariate analysis of donor characteristics, age > 45 years, BMI > 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, lipase > 60 U/L, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) as the cause of death, mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (mCPR), cold ischemia time (CIT) > 600 min and retrieval by another center were identified as potential risk factors; however, they lacked statistical significance. In a multivariate model, age > 45 years (HR 2.05, <i>p</i> = 0.355), BMI > 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (HR 3.18, <i>p</i> = 0.051), lipase > 60 U/L (HR 2.32, <i>p</i> = 0.148), mCPR (HR 8.62, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and CIT > 600 min (HR 1.89, <i>p</i> = 0.142) had the greatest impact on pancreas graft survival. We subsumed these factors in a composite risk model. The combination of three risk factors increased the rate of EGL significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Comparing the pancreas graft survival curves for ≥3 risk factors to <3 risk factors in a Kaplan-Meier model revealed significant inferiority in the pancreas graft survival rate (<i>p</i> = 0.029). <b>Conclusions</b>: When evaluating a potential donor organ, grafts with a combination of three or more risk factors should only be accepted after careful consideration to reduce the risk of EGL and to significantly improve outcomes after PTX.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175177
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outcome-Orientated Organ Allocation—A Composite Risk Model for Pancreas Graft Evaluation and Acceptance

Lukas Johannes Lehner, Nathanael Raschzok, Axel Winter, Brigitta Globke et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
0.57
article

Outcome-Orientated Organ Allocation—A Composite Risk Model for Pancreas Graft Evaluation and Acceptance

Lukas Johannes Lehner, Nathanael Raschzok, Axel Winter, Brigitta Globke, Robert Öllinger, Sophie Reichelt, Johann Pratschke, Fabian Halleck, Max M. Maurer, Andreas Kahl
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Pancreas transplantation (PTX) remains the most effective treatment to prevent long-term complications and provide consistent euglycemia in patients with endocrine pancreatic insufficiency, mainly in type I diabetic patients. Considering early graft loss (EGL) and the perioperative complication rate, an optimal risk stratification based on donor risk factors is paramount. <b>Methods</b>: In our single-center study, we retrospectively assessed the risk factors for EGL and reduced graft survival in 97 PTXs (82 simultaneous pancreas and kidney [SPK], 11 pancreases transplanted after kidney [PAK] and 4 pancreases transplanted alone [PTA]) between 2010 and 2021. By statistically analyzing the incorporation of different donor risk factors using the Kaplan-Meier method and a log-rank test, we introduced a composite risk model for the evaluation of offered pancreas grafts. <b>Results</b>: The overall EGL rate was 6.5%. In the univariate analysis of donor characteristics, age > 45 years, BMI > 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, lipase > 60 U/L, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) as the cause of death, mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (mCPR), cold ischemia time (CIT) > 600 min and retrieval by another center were identified as potential risk factors; however, they lacked statistical significance. In a multivariate model, age > 45 years (HR 2.05, <i>p</i> = 0.355), BMI > 25 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (HR 3.18, <i>p</i> = 0.051), lipase > 60 U/L (HR 2.32, <i>p</i> = 0.148), mCPR (HR 8.62, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and CIT > 600 min (HR 1.89, <i>p</i> = 0.142) had the greatest impact on pancreas graft survival. We subsumed these factors in a composite risk model. The combination of three risk factors increased the rate of EGL significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.003). Comparing the pancreas graft survival curves for ≥3 risk factors to <3 risk factors in a Kaplan-Meier model revealed significant inferiority in the pancreas graft survival rate (<i>p</i> = 0.029). <b>Conclusions</b>: When evaluating a potential donor organ, grafts with a combination of three or more risk factors should only be accepted after careful consideration to reduce the risk of EGL and to significantly improve outcomes after PTX.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(17)
University Hospital Bonn (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.